• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Proof refs are bent! Halseys memoirs

Status
Not open for further replies.
steken1

steken1

Player Valuation: £70m
Good piece today in the Guardian about the self serving idiots sycophantic relationships with PL managers and his own strange atttitude towards it. Here's the piece.

Quite possibly, referee memoirs are God's way of telling modern football it has too much money. But it is a mark of the English game's terminal self-regard that the overwhelming reaction to the former referee Mark Halsey's book is that he shouldn't have published it.

Ever since the first extracts of Added Time hit the news stands on Sunday, there has been a frantically censorious reaction to the revelations contained therein, which include Halsey's text buddydom with Sir Alex Ferguson and the fact that José Mourinho paid for him and his family to stay in a five-star Algarve hotel. I'd assumed the book was subtitled "I'm With The Band", but have discovered Mark went with "Surviving cancer, death threats and the Premier League". Or as the cover proclaims: "Foreword byJosé Mourinho".

The condemnation of the work has been swift and pained, with many wondering aloud why on earth referees should write memoirs. The answer, surely, is because they might say something like this.

In an age where one of the main complaints about football is how ruthlessly access to it is controlled, the more information we can get about how it happens, the better. Millions of us pay for it, one way or another, and the idea that we should be protected from knowing what sort of people play it or run it or officiate it seems ludicrous. At the very least we're owed the sort of distasteful vignette that Halsey produces when he explains he called early time on the first half of a Manchester United game because he needed the bog. (If one more example could be found, we could unite them with Ferguson's diarrhoea defence in court for an hour-long documentary entitled Dumps That Changed The Premier League.)

The first thing in the book's favour is that the Premier League did not want Halsey to publish it, which should be enough of a kitemark for anyone who doesn't trust that radioactively self-important body to act in their best interests, and is instinctively amused by even the possibility that they might be irked by something.

That is not to suggest, however, that Halsey emerges as the plucky hero – one little guy who refused to be silenced, standing up to a system determined to deny him the recognition he deserves.

On the contrary, I'm afraid he emerges as – and forgive me for lapsing into technicalese here – a bit of a twazzock. Be it his needy sucking up to the managers, or imagining that he is playing the big power-broker when he calls Ferguson to get him to defend Mark Clattenburg over his wrongly alleged racist abuse of Mikel John Obi, Mark Halsey's account of Mark Halsey does him even fewer favours than people are now speculating he did certain managers.

But Halsey's twazzockdom is his own lookout – publish and be damned, as the Duke of Wellington put it shortly after finishing Ashley Cole's 2006 memoir. Isn't the most valuable public service such books perform to remind us how small and fallible many of the people associated with top-flight football are, despite all efforts to present the game as a sort of flawless mega-machine inhabited by superhuman personalities and run with unimpeachable protocols? I wouldn't miss anything that tells us the less edifying truth for the world.

Without ill-advised football books, we would never have had the crop of horrors that came out just after England hadn't won the 2006 World Cup, of which Cole's was but one. We would never have known that Ashley once nearly swerved his Aston Martin off the road in a row over an extra £5,000 a week, or that Frank Lampard was thinking "This is England's year" as he took that penalty in Gelsenkirchen, having apparently been watching a different tournament to the rest of us. As far as officialdom's contribution to the memoir canon goes, we would never have known that Graham Poll repeatedly refers to himself in the third person as Polly, or that he panted up to Zinedine Zidane during a Champions League game, begging for his shirt and asking: "Am I good yet?" For their own sakes, of course, these men should have realised that a period of silence would have been politic in perpetuity – but their delusions gave the rest of us a mirthless laugh, and a more refined perspective on events than we might otherwise have had. More revolted, certainly, but more refined.

People in public life, or what passes for it, should always, always write books if they can possibly be bothered. Most of them are unreliable narrators, but they should absolutely be encouraged to march into print for the gaiety of the rest of us – or given a length of rope and told to write a book with it.

If they manage to cash in on their position or former position – and I'm not convinced thousands of copies of Added Time are actually going to be bought – it is a price worth paying for the general merriment of seeing them reveal themselves as they really are. Even the most boring memoirs have the odd anecdote that gives us – fans, voters, whoever it may be – a unique glimpse of one moment, or a shade more insight into those who have power or influence over us. In this spirit, we must agree with Halsey when he self-effacingly describes his opus as a story "that deserved and needed to be told", because it is. Just not in the way he thinks.
Click to expand...
 

Foot Long Hot Dog said:
Not so sure it points to him being bent, being a bit of deluded **** yes, bent? not in my opinion.
Click to expand...

The article itself yes. Lots more to come in the book by all accounts. He's had holidays paid for by managers, personal calls and texts from them, favours and more.

Bent as a 9 bob note IMO. They all are.
 
Halsey can get to fcuk. The ovation we gave him for his first game back and he still didn't give us anything the next time he was at Goodison because suprise, surprise we were playing United

But of course refs aren't bent so I presume we'll be seeing Clattenburg at Goodison this season.
 
Let's face it, they keep their jobs as PL refs by not giving the elite moneybags clubs any problems. The moment they step out of line in that respect they're reffing Swindon v Crawley Town.

They self-police to stay on board the gravy train.
 

davek said:
Let's face it, they keep their jobs as PL refs by not giving the elite moneybags clubs any problems. The moment they step out of line in that respect they're reffing Swindon v Crawley Town.

They self-police to stay on board the gravy train.
Click to expand...

Why should we expect football to be any different than real life? Make things difficult on the rich and you'll get trouble. Hence they get what they want.
 
steken1 said:
The article itself yes. Lots more to come in the book by all accounts. He's had holidays paid for by managers, personal calls and texts from them, favours and more.

Bent as a 9 bob note IMO. They all are.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure Mourinho wasn't managing in the prem when he bought him the holiday, to be fair.

He'd moved off to inter and heard that a ref he'd known in the prem had cancer so bought him a holiday as a cheer up gift.

Given that Halsey has literally never reffed a Mourinho team since, I wouldn't read too much into it.
 
Refs in the Prem arnt bent. Some are hopeless at times, and some clearly have egos, and probably like being part of the "big time". But not bent.

I wish they could talk more to the press actually; give their side of a decision, explain why they did or didnt do something.

I also think that there should be some help with probably the only decision that is made in a match, that is not open to interpretation. Offside. Linesmen usually get it right, but it is a facht when someone is off or on, and easily solved pretty quickly.
 

Are we seriously banning refs from being friendly towards the people they work with?

Do we really want our only refs to be friendless sociopaths incapable of forming any kind of warm relationship with anyone they see on a regular basis?
 
Artetafan said:
Are we seriously banning refs from being friendly towards the people they work with?

Do we really want our only refs to be friendless sociopaths incapable of forming any kind of warm relationship with anyone they see on a regular basis?
Click to expand...

Graham Poll had a signed Gerrard shirt in his front room.
I find that odd.
My opinion only AF.
( unrelated to my above post btw. )
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top