Premier League - ranked by achievement

[Milk]

I don't like any table were that lot are at #1

 

[LeeRab]

I'd have City and Chelsea much lower in that list myself. In fact, if City don't win the league, you could make a case for putting them dead last given the money they spend.

Then going by this logic, the RS shouldn't be at the top either.

There is no moths in their wallet thats for sure

 

[Muzumbu]

To say Spurs spent £105,000,000 and will probably come 6th they should be nearer the bottom.

 

[Garrick]

but yeah, no way should city be second, they have the squad by a mile.

And given how much they spend, they should be doing much better in Europe, too. 2nd in their group and getting punted in the round of 16? When you're spending THAT much money? Ouch.

 

[toffeejack]

And given how much they spend, they should be doing much better in Europe, too. 2nd in their group and getting punted in the round of 16? When you're spending THAT much money? Ouch.

yep, but a few of those teams have some amazing squads - better than city's. anyway, this is about the PL, stay on topic you! ha

 

[spence03]

I would have united bottom. They have spent £70 million and have gone from champions to probably not even in Europe.

A lot of ifs coming up

If Liverpool win the league then they are top, if not then it's Palace for me. If hull win the cup they are second, Sunderland 3rd. I genuinely think di canio's start and fixture congestion is why they were down there that long. Liverpool, if no league title, 4th. Everton 5th.

 

[Baines' left foot]

No question for me now, Pulis for manager of the year. I've really enjoyed watching them rise up the table, except when they destroyed our Champions League dreams the bells.