6 + 2 Point Deductions

[magicjuan]

Whichever way you look at it, this entire set of proceedings is warped.
I get Forest's mitigation given the parachute payments, but the Brennan situation we met twice with Richarlison and Gordon. We also had a new stadium, wars, sanctions on sponsors and Kenwright to contend with.
Surely them buying the population of Laos to play for them is a 'sporting advantage'.
Blow it up.

 

[nsno-chris]

Ah ok my apologies. This thread is changing so quick I can't keep up

Changing quicker than the PL’s implementation of PSR

 

[riddick]

Seriously, can SOMEONE make a good case as to why Forest only got 4 despite being 77% over our amount?

 

[Zezti]

So they're arbitrarily deciding when and who to give reduced punishments to?
If they judge a club is 'exceptionally cooperative' like they supposedly have with Forest, then the fact they breached the rules doesn't matter as much any more and the '6 point minimum' is no longer a minimum?

Are these people 'kin high???

 

[joey_macmo]

Yes, and it's that charge that they cited when they gave Forest 2 back for cooperating

No, you said the 2nd charge we will get 6 points based on the fact we didn’t cooperate.


We didn’t cooperate on the 1st charge initially but did in the end (admitted the charge etc), so it’s only logical that we have continued that cooperation

 

[ashwuk76]

Changing quicker than the PL’s implementation of PSR

It's not that quick .

 

[hallamblue]

After the 2nd deduction We’re effectively looking at administration levels punishment in one season, mad

The alternative is start next season on minus 6, with no Burnley, Sheff Utd and Luton in the league to save us

 

[Goat]

Seriously, can SOMEONE make a good case as to why Forest only got 4 despite being 77% over our amount?

Yes, I can.

 

[Dixieslaces]

Seriously, can SOMEONE make a good case as to why Forest only got 4 despite being 77% over our amount?

errrrrrrrmmmmmmm?


NOPE

 

[nick_waters]

The absolute bollocks of Forest here putting us through the mud.

Exactly. Man City must be laughing themselves silly while we and Forest are pointing fingers at each other.

 

[Moomin]

I thought the IC themselves delayed the first hearing because the complexity of dealing with all the evidence meant it could not be deemed to be a fair process if held by May 23.

We said we were innocent after getting charged in March of last year.

Hearing was set for November and in October we admitted a breach in the pre hearing.

We delayed the decision so we wouldn't get any points deducted in the 22/23 season. Worked in our favour that decision.

 

[Victus]

I wouldn't even say I'm angry now I'm just fed up with this entire season/club. Sooner it's over the better.

 

[ashwuk76]

The mere fact these "independent commissions" are applying the "rules" in such an inconsistent manner imo will only hasten the calls for a football regulator. Clubs wil be running scared as it will be a lottery how many points you get deducted with no actual framework in place.

 

[MACCA75]

Gonna be 21 teams in this league next season IMO.

 

[hallamblue]

No, you said the 2nd charge we will get 6 points based on the fact we didn’t cooperate.


We didn’t cooperate on the 1st charge initially but did in the end (admitted the charge etc), so it’s only logical that we have continued that cooperation

It all depends what they call cooperation. We came out publicly to say we didn't agree with the charge, but as far as I know we've cooperated since. Who knows tbh, I would assume 6 more deducted and try and stay up based on that.