If masters indeed called us a small club, I hope the club pick this up.
I did say yesterday, fully expect masters to “move on” in the near future
Around 1 minute of this - he referred to "the small clubs"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
If masters indeed called us a small club, I hope the club pick this up.
I did say yesterday, fully expect masters to “move on” in the near future
Chelsea question - maybe I’m remembering wrong but I’m old and angry so…Chelsea getting away with it because the owners been grassing the Abramovic regime up. Figures.
Yeah, football has always been more or less about who has the most money. That’s life and unless you embrace some sort of US-style socialism/ profit sharing there’s not much you can do about it.
The problem with FFP is that it’s frozen time: it’s not about who has the most money now but who had the most money when it was implemented.
I’ve no love for Newcastle or the Saudis but if they are the richest club they should be able to spend like the richest club. The big six could when they were.
Sustainability rules are in place so that clubs aren't reliant on owners pumping money in. We are completely reliant on Moshiri and or Usmanov bankrolling us.What denial?
I think the rules are a nonsense. I think Everton are being punished for building a stadium and Forest are being punished for building a better football team. That's my opinion. You won't change it.
And you still haven't given me a single valid reason why both these clubs should be punished for these things under sustainability rules. Your pro-PL agenda is baffling, and you clearly haven't read the findings properly. That much is clear from your posts.
The denial from you is breathtaking. Moshiri has come out and admitted that we had to carry on spending because the midfield was crap. As for Forest the reaction from their fans is totally different. They have in essence put their hands up and know the club broke the rules.
Around 1 minute of this - he referred to "the small clubs"
Sustainability rules are in place so that clubs aren't reliant on owners pumping money in. We are completely reliant on Moshiri and or Usmanov bankrolling us.
As for being pro-PL. I am not what I am against is the board rabble-rousing and looking to pass the buck. The PL didn't get us into this mess it was the board.
Again all legitimate spending on the Stadium isn't used for PSR losses. So building the Stadium has nothing to do with the club overspending on players and wages.
We’ve been trying to get the board out for years you thick gobshite.Sustainability rules are in place so that clubs aren't reliant on owners pumping money in. We are completely reliant on Moshiri and or Usmanov bankrolling us.
As for being pro-PL. I am not what I am against is the board rabble-rousing and looking to pass the buck. The PL didn't get us into this mess it was the board.
Again all legitimate spending on the Stadium isn't used for PSR losses. So building the Stadium has nothing to do with the club overspending on players and wages.
did we use the same solicitors, barrister(s) or did we use a barrister from the same chambers?We used the same firm at the last hearing.
We are a small club .....Chelsea question - maybe I’m remembering wrong but I’m old and angry so…
Foreseeable events - loss of sponsorship.
How shortsighted of the Everton board not to realise there was going to be a war in Europe and their main sponsor was going to be blocked.
Everton lost all USM sponsorship and stadium naming rights payments to complete BMD. Hence the need for payday loans.
How much of this income was replaced with new/replacement deals? Was there a shortfall in the new contracts?
PL are a private organisation and government should not interfere in domestic leagues - according to uefa/fifa iirc.
Why then, did the government ‘take over’ the running and financing of Chelsea when Ukraine kicked off?
Effectively putting Chelsea in a bubble till a mega rich owner was found and all their finances were sorted so they never lost a penny. They have in fact, now been able to invest more than Abramovich was willing to invest and come up with new ways of buying players.
Why did the PL allow this interference? Chelsea should have foreseen this event was going to happen and taken steps to avoid problems.
They were given a distinct advantage over others who had sponsorship from blacklisted companies.
How can the PL allow one club to be protected by an outside entity and tell another club the same excuse is invalid?
Why didn’t our defence include this unfair comparison of ours and Chelsea’s finances?
Brighton is interesting and got me thinking. They have sold really well but looking at a 3 year rolling period you could get the following;
Y1 - sell well and make 200m profit
Y2 - invest and make 100m loss
Y3 - invest and make 100m loss
Y4 - break even
As a business over 4 years they break even, but would fail PSR by 95m in the Y2, 3 & 4 rolling period. Is that fair play?