PL clubs charge up to £600 for children to be mascots

[Woolly Blue]

Yeah - its for a good cause, but by suggesting we ' dont charge for mascots ' is not true, and i believe in the past we have charged a flat fee too.

Had a quick check before. Looks like in 2011 some mascots were chosen in the same way as they are now while others had a "corporate" experience. Reidy would know better.

A mate of mine's daughter was a mascot last season ( or maybe the season before ? ) and I know that was free. She was just chosen by virtue of being a young STH.

Well done Everton.

Now start paying a minimum wage to your workforce, you tight *****.

Haha, never change mate.
Change "minimum" to "living" and I'd agree with you

 

[bizzaro]

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/dec/18/premier-league-clubs-charge-600-children-mascots

Really good to see, as expected, that Everton are one of only 9 Premier League clubs who do not charge for children to be mascots.

On the contrary, West Ham charge £600. Way to exclude families from poorer backgrounds, Hammers.

Madness. In the 2009 FA cup final someone paid £5000 TO CHARITY for it (Everton in the community)

But to make it standard. Charging is wrong.

These clubs are out of order doing it