RFUS
Anustart
Agreed. There are some fans (and probably Vic himself) who just see a goal and nothing else and that means he did well. In some teams that would be enough but the way we play we need more from that position. That said, lazy + scoring is a hell of a lot better than lazy + not scoring. So credit to him there he's found his touch around goal. Plus the celebration was better. He still doesn't get it though which is a shame.
I've never been a Neville hater (quite the opposite actually) but he did not play well. I think we need Fellaini up front but until Gibson is back he may have to drop back. Nevs should probably be on the bench as Hibbo is playing quite well. It's a shame as he does organize the team well and he's done a great job for us over the years.
Officials are just depressing. Why isn't there a "if it's 50/50 it's a goal" rule -- it seems to be the opposite ... they need to be 100% sure it WAS a goal before giving a goal. This isn't the death penalty ... it's goals. People like goals. They make DVDs of just goals. Sometimes the decision might go against us but I'd feel a lot better about the game if they had to be sure it WASN'T a goal.
The second made sense because perhaps the linesman wasn't sure and so can't say it is a goal, just rather, I don't know.
But he raised his flag for the first. That means he thought it was offside. He was sure enough to rule out a goal.
How? It was onside. And though it was tight the pass was from inches away so he barely had to adjust his vision. Poor stuff.