Moshiri Poll Reset: 31/8/16

Has things actually improved under Moshiri.

  • YES

    Votes: 349 50.1%
  • NO

    Votes: 111 15.9%
  • SACK THE BOARD

    Votes: 37 5.3%
  • HE DESERVES MORE TIME

    Votes: 160 23.0%
  • CHEESE ON TOAST WITH A SIDE OF PHANTOM BID

    Votes: 39 5.6%

  • Total voters
    696
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you refuting the fact that Maarten Stekelenburg was the Netherlands' number 1 until a few months ago?

I have no idea why you think that. He played in the 2012 tournament then Cillisen took over as number one.

In fact Stek was even dropped from the squad for a while and only brought back in November yet not as first choice
 

*refuses to focus until Chico posts his preview...until then it's not real.

btw; If I was focused...which I'm not, just checking here...Moyes is still the one with the knife in this gunfight? Right? because I've got this nagging picture in my head of James Coburn in the Magnificent 7 throwing his knife in the head of the other guy with the gun.

but I'm not at all focused never mind worried.

No not me

Not at all
ppppffffft... Chico tries too hard to be Mark O'Brien....not in the same class!
 
If I can clarify for both of you the short term debt.

We arrange a facility through R&M Funding (they're not the lenders, they act as an intermediary for the true lender). In return for the facility we assign the final payments due to us from the Premier League broadcasting income received usually in June. As a result of that assignment the funds due to us are paid directly to the lender who nets off the outstanding balance, clearing the debt and they then forward the balance to us.

In previous years we've then renegotiated a new facility sometime in August and we draw down from that facility as our cash flow requires it.

Exactly the same process has taken place this year - debt cleared from the final payments made by the Premier League and a new facility negotiated in late August.

Do we know what West Ham has done in this respect? In the past they have been loaned money by the same company on the same date (I think this is right). Have they renewed their debt facility as well?
 
I have no idea why you think that. He played in the 2012 tournament then Cillisen took over as number one.

In fact Stek was even dropped from the squad for a while and only brought back in November yet not as first choice
And in his absence Netherlands failed to qualify for the Euros? Just give the guy a chance. I'm sure he hasn't been brought in as a long term solution but he allows us time to find someone without rushing in.
 
Comedy gold. Don't ever change will you, far too entertaining.

tumblr_nnsmurrVV71s5naw0o1_400.gif

lol

The only thing that's funny is you who can't actually make a point but can only revert to hilarious gifs and insults. Let's face it, you don't know how things will turn out so pack in the monotonous patronising drivel.
 
Last edited:

Do we know what West Ham has done in this respect? In the past they have been loaned money by the same company on the same date (I think this is right). Have they renewed their debt facility as well?

Yes because their level of debt is greater than funds received at end of season, something that is possible given the wordings of the assignment document which includes assignment of the following seasons revenues. Hence with West Ham there's an immediate roll over and continuation.
 
I put give him more time, the transfer window is but one facet of ownership, I think we are headed in the right direction, for some reason we seem to be the only team who can't buy there way to the top(not that was ever the case) the damage will be fixed and good things will happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top