I really can't make up my mind. Although the idea of being Tesco's bitch isn't that appealing. I suppose its better than what's happened to Liverpool, MU and City (if it goes ahead). I mean there's some murky investors out there, although anyone who has made 500 million odd to buy a footy team is hardly likely to be squeaky clean.
This Kirby in Liverpool thing is so Liverpool (anyone noticed how territorial we can be?). It's not like anyone thinks people from Kirby aren't scousers. Maybe they should just change the council and call Kirby Liverpool and be done with it.
I think people are worried about "giving the City to Liverpool". Well if we move, we are gonna get a load of [Poor language removed] from kopites saying "we are a wooly back team or worse". But if we stay, they'll give us [Poor language removed] for something else. Its not like we are moving to Brighton or anything.
But does anyone out there by now, not know how to handle a Liverpool fans taunts?
Not lost a slanging match once.
Still not decided on the move, but it is obvious to everyone that our ground needs redevelopment and an increase in the quality and quantity of facilities. My biggest problem is the total lack of options. Anytime you are forced into a yes or no question (I'm not referring to the Poll but the actual situation) or a limited number of options, your are in a position of anti-wealth.
We should be looking at a selection of sites, oppportunities and sponsors/investors. Not Kirby or nothing.
I think the board owe it to the fans and the heritage of the club to look deeply into all options available before signing these exclusivity agreements.