Kevin Webster (Micheal Le Vel)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jags..class

Player Valuation: £70m
he is is accused of 19 sex offences including raping a child.

Last year there was not enough evidence and now there enough for 19 charges, Savile effect and want the jury to decide or they have found more evidence
 


I find it quite disturbing that 18 months after a declaration of 'not enough evidence to proceed with charges', that the same evidence is reviewed and suddenly is sufficent to charge him with 19 offences.

I question the original investigation to be honest.
 
I find it quite disturbing that 18 months after a declaration of 'not enough evidence to proceed with charges', that the same evidence is reviewed and suddenly is sufficent to charge him with 19 offences.

I question the original investigation to be honest.



Does this come down to the 'double jeapordy' law.....( does it still exist ?) where the CPS are scared to take people to court unless they have an absolute watertight case for fear of the defendant walking away and being unable to face trial on the same charges again ?
 
Really dont want this to be true, but did,nt his missus tell him to do one after the last investigation.

Innocent till proven guilty and all that, but if there is any truth in this, a message of intent has got to be nailed home hard FFS!!!
 
Really dont want this to be true, but did,nt his missus tell him to do one after the last investigation.

Innocent till proven guilty and all that, but if there is any truth in this, a message of intent has got to be nailed home hard FFS!!!

Yeah he did split up with his wife after the last investigation.
Corrie have suspended him till the outcome of the trial. Do feel for those who are named before a verdit cos their names are ruined, suspended fro his job. the police must be sure about this to charge him with 19, when last year they didnt charge him with 1.
 

Does this come down to the 'double jeapordy' law.....( does it still exist ?) where the CPS are scared to take people to court unless they have an absolute watertight case for fear of the defendant walking away and being unable to face trial on the same charges again ?



That no longer exists mate.

It smacks of, the burden of proof being asked for by the CPS being lowered in cases of this nature, as a result of the Saville case imo.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top