The game has been corrupted by poor officiating. And poor officiating is allowed because those running the game want to protect Manu, LFC, Chelsea, Arsenal and now Man City and 'brand' premier league. Referees do not look at the incident and judge it for what it is but as influenced by the club or the manager. Newcastle's Cisse was banned for an elbow as was Swansea's Shelvey due to retrospective action. But Cahill can kick lumps out of Kane and stamp on him but doesn't get banned. How can a referee not see that the ball hit the Leicester player on the face, at Anfield, but somehow thinks it hit his hand? Likewise, how can a FIFA liner, Mallarky, not draw the refs attention to Sterling who put a hand in the face of a Swansea player, when he was a foot away.
And as of today Mike Jones or Riley have not apologised to Leicester for such a poor decision but Mourinho gets an apology for booking Fabregas for a dive and not giving a penalty. Steve Bruce has not received an apology from Chris Foy for not booking Cahill for a dive that would have seen him sent off. never mind the two footed challenge on a Hull player that should have been a straight red and not just his first booking.
Hackett has opened a can of worms and the football establishment are out in force 'protecting' Riley and referees. Talksport couldn't wait to launch an attack on Hackett. But they have been remarkably silent on Leicester's face ball penalty against the RS, Cahill diving, Cahill's wellying Kane and stamping on him and Sterling's attempted punch.
The football media know which sid etheir bread is buttered on and make a good living out of protecting the premier 'brand'. Which includes covering up when decisions go in favour of Manu, LFC, Arsenal, Chelsea and now City. Retrospective action will only be highlighted if the football media want it to. And what was Pearson thinking of, in his post match interview, for not going ballistic about the poor officiating by Jones. Incredible. But if a fan has a go at him, about how he is managing the team, he goes ape sh*t. He, like our own Martinez, needs to highlight constantly the appalling decisions by referees.
Why did Marriner give an appalling penalty decision? Was it anything to do with Chelsea getting beat at Newcastle? So that the title race would be 'wide open if City beat Everton' and the 'brand of being 'the best league in the world' would be able to be promoted by Sky to get bums on sofas and in pubs.
What did Scudamore say about Manu doing badly?
"Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore admits that Manchester United’s struggles this season have damaged the global appeal of the competition.
Considered one of the world’s biggest sporting brands, United have a huge fan-base outside the UK, and their slump since Sir Alex Ferguson was replaced by David Moyes has already affected commercial success.
Speaking during a promotional visit to Johannesburg, Scudamore told Bloomberg: ‘It’s a double-edged sword. When your most popular club isn’t doing as well, that costs you interest and audience in some places.
'There’s lots of fans around the world who wish Manchester United were winning it again,’ he added. ‘But you have to balance that off against putting on a competition.’
The Premier League are reported to earn around £2.23 billion from the sales of all their overseas rights to live games for the three-year period, 2013 to 2016, with Asia contributing the major share of £941m".
You don't need money in brown paper bags to have corruption and corrupt officiating going on. But people who know which side their bread is buttered on.