Is Naisy our new Cahill?

[johnnyW]

You're not comparing like with like in an attempt to make a biased argument.

The only embarrassing thing is you keep trying to claim something people can see straight through.

of course am not comparing like with like because we are talking about barkley and Naismith what's like for like there?

my point is and has always been we should be nurturing ross talent not playing him out of position and damming him for his poor performances there. naismith being a starter for everton is depressing. imagine if we got champions leauge and playing the likes of naismith and McGeady against barca and bayern... oh wait we won't you know why because we start player like naismith and McGeady.

What is this thing I am claiming and you can see through then?

 

[bizzaro]

of course am not comparing like with like because we are talking about barkley and Naismith what's like for like there?

You're comparing a period including where Naismith was injured with one where Barkley was not.

Its laughable you're trying to maintain this charade.

 

[johnnyW]

You're comparing a period including where Naismith was injured with one where Barkley was not.

Its laughable you're trying to maintain this charade.

and You are comparing a season where barkley has been injured for half of it. The failings in this aspect of your argument is astounding.

what charade?

The fact that you keep on banging on about the same tiny aspect of what I've been saying to me proves that you have no defence to the points am making. its pathetic really.

 

[bizzaro]

and You are comparing a season where barkley has been injured for half of it. The failings in this aspect of your argument is astounding.

what charade?

The fact that you keep on banging on about the same tiny aspect of what I've been saying to me proves that you have no defence to the points am making. its pathetic really.

I think you will find I'm not the one doing comparisons. You are.

 

[johnnyW]

I think you will find I'm not the one doing comparisons. You are.

why dose the term "you can't argue with a fool" spring to mind.

ah I've just seen your avatar. no wonder you are defending naismith but can't actually defend him against the points I've raised. you're just a little fan boy.

 

[bizzaro]

why dose the term "you can't argue with a fool" spring to mind.

ah I've just seen your avatar. no wonder you are defending naismith but can't actually defend him against the points I've raised. you're just a little fan boy.

I don't need to defend him. Your points are nonsense. Deliberately trying to include periods where Naismith didnt play too.

 

[Steven Verhoeven]

Loses the ball to much but can't fault his work rate its superb

 

[Shagster]

Loses the ball to much but can't fault his work rate its superb

Bloody hell mate there's a few that lose the ball too much - agree about the work rate tho. You need players like that in the prem...it's not Ross or Naisys fault that they clash in terms of the team selection.

 

[johnnyW]

I don't need to defend him. Your points are nonsense. Deliberately trying to include periods where Naismith didnt play too.

Yeah you keep saying that but haven't even tried to explain why. makes me think you cant.

still Trying to cling onto that one point eh.

 

[Haston]

but naismith hasn't played well enough to justify his return straight into the team has he.

I understand what you're saying and I agree that Barkley should be in the no.10 role with Naismith starting on the left, I think he's better from the left than he is on the right where Moyes used to play him. I think that Naismith's movement in the final third is important to the team. I thought we lacked that when he had a spell out. I don't like when Martinez plays him deeper because his passing isn't great. I like him buzzing around up front though dragging defenders all over, creating space for the likes of Barkley and Mirallas to drive into.

I agree also that he is a good impact sub to bring on against tiring defenders, at the moment though he is always going to start because McGeady is struggling (and suspended) and Pienaar can't stay fit.

 

[royvernon39]

Lacks the quality to play for EFC.

He would not get a look in at the top clubs.

 

[4737carlin]

Lacks the quality to play for EFC.

He would not get a look in at the top clubs.

That dosen't make sense, lacks quality to play for who, Chelsea? Arsenal? United? Everton arn't at that level, which means he is good enough for play for us.