If you could have one question answered...

Status
Not open for further replies.
And this is rather interesting also...


I've never really seen much about tower 7. That looks iffy, to say the least. Why would a tower collapse in such a uniform manner? If it'd taken a hit from debris for the other towers, you'd expect it to list and crumble in that direction. But a straight-down collapse like that? Odd.
 

I've never really seen much about tower 7. That looks iffy, to say the least. Why would a tower collapse in such a uniform manner? If it'd taken a hit from debris for the other towers, you'd expect it to list and crumble in that direction. But a straight-down collapse like that? Odd.

If you watch Part 1 as well as Part 2 of the vids, you'll see that guy suggests it was underground nuclear ewxplosions beneath the three towers. Being underground, the explosions created the shock waves that travelled up through the towers, causing internal disintegration, thereby the sudden collapse the way they did. I'm not explaining it properly, I know, but the two vids make you think...
 
If you watch Part 1 as well as Part 2 of the vids, you'll see that guy suggests it was underground nuclear ewxplosions beneath the three towers. Being underground, the explosions created the shock waves that travelled up through the towers, causing internal disintegration, thereby the sudden collapse the way they did. I'm not explaining it properly, I know, but the two vids make you think...
Yeah I got the gist of it from the video. Naturally the bit that doesn't fit is - why?!
 
Yeah I got the gist of it from the video. Naturally the bit that doesn't fit is - why?!

All I can make of it, is that the big corporate businesses need to maintain their money-making on a grand scale. The armaments industry needs wars/conflicts to maintain their existence, and the 'natural' threat is from the middle east (but not those parts that the USA have a vested interest in, i.e. the oil kingdoms). So the whole 'terrorism' scenario comes into play.

The USA killing their own citizens? There was a secret plan drawn up in the early 1960s when the situation with Cuba was volatile, which basically meant that there would be a 'simulated' attack on the USA by Cuba, involving the US Government killing some of their own people in the area close to Cuba, to justify a full-scale invasion of Cuba to oust Castro. Check out 'Operation Northwood'.

So the top strata of society in the USA, including the top Government organisations, are not beyond such machinations. You only have to look at Flight 93 that crashed in open countryside on 9/11. No human remains found, no parts of an aircraft consistent with an aircraft of that size crashing in the countryside.
This vid is most interesting:


When large aircraft crash at a shallow angle, there's a lot of surface wreckage. When they crash vertically going at 400 mph+, they leave a feckin' big hole deep in the ground (check out pics of Spitfires, Hurricanes Messerschmitt 109s, Fw190s, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, aircraft with front-loaded engines - those engines are first to hit, and dig deep).

Too many unanswered questions...

But it's fascinating stuff!
 
All I can make of it, is that the big corporate businesses need to maintain their money-making on a grand scale. The armaments industry needs wars/conflicts to maintain their existence, and the 'natural' threat is from the middle east (but not those parts that the USA have a vested interest in, i.e. the oil kingdoms). So the whole 'terrorism' scenario comes into play.

The USA killing their own citizens? There was a secret plan drawn up in the early 1960s when the situation with Cuba was volatile, which basically meant that there would be a 'simulated' attack on the USA by Cuba, involving the US Government killing some of their own people in the area close to Cuba, to justify a full-scale invasion of Cuba to oust Castro. Check out 'Operation Northwood'.

So the top strata of society in the USA, including the top Government organisations, are not beyond such machinations. You only have to look at Flight 93 that crashed in open countryside on 9/11. No human remains found, no parts of an aircraft consistent with an aircraft of that size crashing in the countryside.
This vid is most interesting:


When large aircraft crash at a shallow angle, there's a lot of surface wreckage. When they crash vertically going at 400 mph+, they leave a feckin' big hole deep in the ground (check out pics of Spitfires, Hurricanes Messerschmitt 109s, Fw190s, Mustangs, Thunderbolts, aircraft with front-loaded engines - those engines are first to hit, and dig deep).

Too many unanswered questions...

But it's fascinating stuff!

Pretty much the central tenet of 1984. Problem is, it's hard to debunk it.
 

Here's another vid, Cowboy, that you might find interesting, particularly what the air stewardess whispers at the end of her recorded message to her husband: 'It's a frame'. The last 3 minutes are explosive!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top