http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2011/02/are_hedge_fund_managers_the_to.htmlJust like most of Labour funding comes from the Unions. Political party in looking out for supporters shock.
Agreed Bruce sadly though it's in both parties interest to maintain the status quo and politics becomes ever more rotten.Exactly, and neither is good for impartiality, but this is my concern with politics is it often gets driven by minority groups rather than the population as a whole.
The Swiss have got it right. True democracy.Agreed Bruce sadly though it's in both parties interest to maintain the status quo and politics becomes ever more rotten.
The Swiss have got it right. True democracy.
http://direct-democracy.geschichte-schweiz.ch/switzerlands-system-referendums.html
Would it work here though?
100% agree with you there mate no argument from me and its a bloody shame becuase with first the banks going tats up then the expense's malarkey we had a once in a 100 year chance to utterly reform parliament and the ways its run,to be truly be "new politics" but no sadly the tories grabbed back the power they so desperately wanted back for the last 13 years,the libdems just wanted power.We'll never find out mate. The chattering classes in London will see to that.
100% agree with you there mate no argument from me and its a bloody shame becuase with first the banks going tats up then the expense's malarkey we had a once in a 100 year chance to utterly reform parliament and the ways its run,to be truly be "new politics" but no sadly the tories grabbed back the power they so desperately wanted back for the last 13 years,the libdems just wanted power.
And the sad thing is Labour would have done the same it is utterly depressing
Just like most of Labour funding comes from the Unions. Political party in looking out for supporters shock.
Dave, sorry mate but that is utterly stupid to start a thread on that story. We all know where their funds come from just as labour get theirs from the unions. WE are not completely ignoramus you know.
Here's my point, though: are the Labour Party charged with setting conditions for the paying back by the unions of billions of pounds that they took off the population in the past three years? Clearly not. But the Tories are charged with forcing the banks to cough up a bit of pay back from all the pork barrel they've swallowed in the same time period. So isn't there a conflict of interests there when those administering tax regulations and policing the bonus culture in the financial sector are themselves in the pocket of the financial institutions? I think there is you know, and the recent con trick of Osborne's to make it look like the Banks have been hammered (a few hundred million quid when Labour were taking £3B+ off them last year) underlines why the connection between Tory party and these donators is important to appreciate.