Just in the interest of balance, I wonder what the general response was when GCSEs were introduced in place of O-levels? For the record I don't know the answer, it's not a leading question, but there are many folks who just like to grumble about change.
As with Reidy, I've heard many good things about the International Baccalaureate, but Brennan says they're different.
I found this just now http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/nov/27/labour-english-baccalaureate-languages
Seems back then Labour supported the move as it meant a greater focus on the core GCSE subjects, thus moving the temptation for schools to puff up their league table results with less academic subjects.
As with Reidy, I've heard many good things about the International Baccalaureate, but Brennan says they're different.
I found this just now http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/nov/27/labour-english-baccalaureate-languages
Seems back then Labour supported the move as it meant a greater focus on the core GCSE subjects, thus moving the temptation for schools to puff up their league table results with less academic subjects.