Gagging Laws Debate today!The plan to silence criticism is going through Parliament

Status
Not open for further replies.

BLUENOWZ1878

Player Valuation: £6m
The government’s plan to silence criticism is whizzing through parliament. [1] Alongside other organisations - from Oxfam to the Countryside Alliance - 38 Degrees members have been turning up the pressure on MPs. [2] And it’s working. Today, the government tried to grab back the initiative. They’ve published changes to the plans which they say would address the main concerns. [3]

But they’re trying to dupe us - and dupe MPs. Their suggested changes are cosmetic, not substantial. The thrust of the ‘gagging law’ will remain exactly as is. And it's not just our opinion - charities aren’t supporting the government’s changes either.

The two key organisations representing charities, non-profits and voluntary organisations, NCVO and ACEVO, have also rejected today’s announcement. NCVO say that the changes “do not go far enough”, and “leave a great deal of uncertainty and ambiguity”. ACEVO has said that they “don’t prevent the Bill curbing freedom of speech around elections”. [6]

At every previous vote, MPs were told to keep supporting the gagging law. They were assured that the government would make changes to address the groundswell of concern. At the last vote, the minister responsible, Andrew Lansley, said he’d listened to the outcry, and that he would fix the worst bits. [7] Now his changes have been published - and they don’t fix it.





Urgent: MPs are arriving at parliament right now for their last vote on the gagging law
before it moves on to the House of Lords. Over the last few weeks we’ve made it controversial, but now there are only hours left and many MPs are still undecided.

Ideally MPs would vote against the whole of part two of the lobbying bill - the part known as the gagging law. If they won’t do that, they should vote for changes that improve the law. In the last few days, a respected MP, Graham Allen, has proposed a change which would improve one of the worst parts of the law. It’s called amendment 102. [1] But it still needs a majority of MPs to vote for it later today.

The change is being supported by NCVO and a group of MPs from different parties - but not enough MPs are on board yet. [2]

38 Degrees members across the country are tweeting at their MPs today asking them to support the change - but your MP’s not on Twitter. It’s unlikely that they'll be checking their emails or taking phone calls, especially once the debate has started. So the best way to influence the vote is to up the noise on Twitter to the point where MPs who are on Twitter start feeling the heat and are pushed to vote the right way.

As we count down to the vote, can you help get the #gagginglaw hashtag trending?

The more of us who join in on Twitter today, the more MPs will be feeling the pressure. Can you make sure that Twitter is abuzz with tweets using the #gagginglaw hashtag? MPs need to see how strongly people feel about this bad law.

The office team will be live-tweeting the debate, too - join the debate on the #gagginglaw feed now, then find us @38_degrees.
 

The government’s sinister gagging Bill created an almost unprecedented outcry last week as a broad coalition joined together to tell the government to go back to the drawing board. Organisations as diverse as Shelter, the Royal British Legion and the Taxpayers' Alliance slammed the plans as undemocratic.

Everyone had a very clear message for David Cameron: don’t gag democratic debate just because you might not like what people have to say.

Over the last three years, charities and campaigners have played a crucial role in holding this government to account. It was a coalition of professional organisations including the Royal College of Nursing and the Royal College of General Practitioners that helped lead the charge against David Cameron’s wasteful and damaging reorganisation of the NHS. The Citizens Advice Bureau who sounded the alarm over the introduction of Universal Credit. Shelter that described the bedroom tax as "devastating". Crisis who criticised housing benefit changes for increasing homelessness. And a raft of childcare charities who warned about the closure of Sure Start centres.

It is no wonder that the government want to make it more difficult for charities and campaigners to make their voice heard.

This Bill says it all about this government. They have the wrong priorities and they stand up for the wrong people. Instead of listening to valid concerns from organisations across civil society, they are just trying to ram through legislation to make it harder for them to have their say. Instead of writing a Bill that would stand up to Lynton Crosby lobbying for big tobacco, they are trying to restrict cancer charities from talking about plain packaging. Instead of facing up to the real problem of big money and vested interests in our politics, they are attacking people power instead.

David Cameron used to evangelise about the big society, but now we understand what he really meant. His vision of charity is homeless shelters and food banks to deal with the huge social problems his policies have created, but he certainly doesn’t want his army of volunteers to have a say.

This Bill isn’t the government’s first attack on the vibrancy of our democratic debate; it has been a developing theme. Just look at restrictions on civil and criminal legal aid. The curtailment of the use of judicial review. Attacks on human rights legislation. The clamp down on the use of FOIs. This is a government determined to insulate itself from the crucial checks and balances that a healthy democracy needs.

An article from Chris Grayling last week highlighted this new Tory authoritarianism. He attacked the mainstream charitable sector in the UK, saying "Britain cannot afford to allow a culture of Left-wing-dominated, single-issue activism to hold back our country". Simply because organisations with social concerns dare to highlight the damaging effects of Tory policy. And of course it isn’t just policy criticism they are afraid of either. The other week the Tories were in uproar because the BFI had deigned to fund a film about the posh boys in the Bullingdon Club.

The House of Commons will debate the government’s gagging law in more detail in committee stage today. We understand that the pressure from campaigners has forced Andrew Lansley to agree one small concession. While we look forward to hearing the detail, it seems at this stage that it will be nowhere near enough. Even if the government improves the definition of controlled expenditure, a multitude of problems remain including the wider list of activities that have to be regulated, the lower thresholds for reporting, the burdensome new reporting requirements and the unworkable proposed constituency rules. In short, the Bill is still riddled with problems.

The government won’t lift their gag by making piecemeal concessions; they must for once listen to civil society and go back to the drawing board.

Angela Eagle is the Labour MP for Wallasey and shadow leader of the House of Commons

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/09/new-tory-authoritarians-are-trying-gag-debate
 
I'm all for the government not gagging debate

However, certain papers conduct in the past 10-30 years has been abhorrent. Maybe they are incapable of regulating themselves? Maybe the government and the newspapers should not be in charge but an independant body instead?
Lemon curry?
 
I'm all for the government not gagging debate

However, certain papers conduct in the past 10-30 years has been abhorrent. Maybe they are incapable of regulating themselves? Maybe the government and the newspapers should not be in charge but an independant body instead?
Lemon curry?
Don't confuse this with Leveson.

It's not about newspapers.

It's a completely separate Bill about squashing opposition to Government and big business by community groups, charities and unions etc. Watch the video above.
 
Last edited:

Quote from another forum.Isn't this being brought in to block the objection campaigns to HS2 by changing the action groups funding?.................??????
 
Quote from another forum.Isn't this being brought in to block the objection campaigns to HS2 by changing the action groups funding?.................??????
It is much bigger than that - it affects almost all organised opposition to Government.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top