• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Financial Fair Play

Status
Not open for further replies.

toffeejack

Player Valuation: £100m
What a load of utter crap this is. Just another excuse for footballing bodies to show that they're all money grabbing cun... you get the jist. Fining QPR measly £44m for what they've done. As highlighted below, they've earned £148m since their spending, so how on earth is a fine like this going to actually stop any club. The EFL were only looking at the pound signs instead of looking after the sport. The whole point of bringing in such rules is to create an equal playing field, of sorts. Chuck them out of the EFL and let them have to try and build themselves back up after years.

Useless, no team in the world is actualy scared of governing bodies so long as they have a bit of money.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44984660


QPR's £42m settlement with the English Football League for breaking Financial Fair Play rules will not deter other clubs from spending big in pursuit of Premier League riches, according to two football finance experts.

The settlement includes a £17m fine, paying £3m of the EFL's legal costs and the agreement from club shareholders to write off £22m of outstanding loans.

Kieran Maguire, a lecturer in football finance at the University of Liverpool, and Dr Rob Wilson, a sport finance specialist at Sheffield Hallam University, both said the fine could have been bigger.

"QPR have earned £148m in broadcasting fees and parachute payments since committing the offence so the fine does not act as a disincentive for clubs in the future," said Maguire.

"The owners made the decision to go ahead with ignoring the FFP rules in the first place and they are independently wealthy to absorb the true penalty, which should have been at least twice the sum charged."

Maguire added that having shareholders agree to turn £21.965m of outstanding loans into capital "is merely an accounting housekeeping issue".

The EFL declined to comment when contacted by BBC Sport.

Rangers are controlled by co-chairmen Tony Fernandes and Ruben Gnanalingam, with Kamarudin Bin Meranun and the family of Indian steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal also holding stakes.

Wilson said the fine and settlement is "more severe" than any faced by sides in the past - but "does not go far enough to put clubs off" overspending in pursuit of promotion.

QPR's deal comes in the same month that Bournemouth reached a £4.75m settlement of their own with the EFL, having originally been expected to pay a fine of £7.5m for breaking rules when they won promotion in 2014-15.

Earlier this year Leicester City faced a £3.1m settlement having broken spending rules to win promotion in 2013-14. Two years later, they won the Premier League title and in the three seasons after winning promotion made a combined pre-tax profit of £52m.

"The rewards are so great in the Premier League, so you would expect the fine to be a bit more substantial," said Wilson.

"But it is difficult - there is a point where you may push too far and there may be more legal challenges or the club will go to the wall, and no-one wants to see that.

"It's a balanced verdict in many ways.

"This fine makes a big statement, but it could have been even bigger to stop people doing it completely."
 

I think a big issue here is that the league are
never going to anything that’s going to ultimately end a football club and leave thousands of fans angry and without anyone to support.

So of course they’ll just use it as a money making exercise.
 
I think a big issue here is that the league are
never going to anything that’s going to ultimately end a football club and leave thousands of fans angry and without anyone to support.

So of course they’ll just use it as a money making exercise.

well the rangers fans had to do it all again because they broke the rules. Why can't they have the balls to make a decision like that in england?
 
I've got to imagine that if it were one of the money clubs the fine would be even less. The problem is they want to both even the playing field and also allow the top clubs to stay successful because they make them the most money. Clearly that's not possible so you get shams like FFP to convince the lower clubs they have a shot while not doing anything to actual even it out
 

The gap between top 6 and the PL also-rans is ridiculous let alone Championship and beyond.

All promoted clubs seem to be spending crazy amounts and Wolves have some dodgy arrangement with Portuguese players that Forest seem to have now.

Villa gambled and failed.
 
The gap between top 6 and the PL also-rans is ridiculous let alone Championship and beyond.

All promoted clubs seem to be spending crazy amounts and Wolves have some dodgy arrangement with Portuguese players that Forest seem to have now.

Villa gambled and failed.
Villa got a bail out, there new owners worth 6.8 billion.
 
In theory, FFP system is good, but so far, it has only worked against teams which do not have a strong lobby. Otherwise, teams like PSG would have been penalised. Therefore, it should drop the adjective fair in the title or start to be applied against relatively strong teams.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top