harryjam
Player Valuation: £8m
Bit of a debate on another forum on Cahill and how effective he is for us. People are saying he's better than you think on the floor, that we need him because of his commitment and ability to rough up opposing players. Others including myself believe it's time to move on from Cahill, that the 4-5-1 just doesn't work, that the player "in the hole" would be better if it was someone creative (Arteta/Barkley/Gueye?) who appreciates getting into space and can play a killer ball. Some people say, hang on, Cahill has scored 65 and made 35 in 240 games from midfield, he's valuable. But isn't this in a system which is totally based around him? How much more effective would we be if the "one in the hole" was someone that we weren't tempted to play it long to, instead we'd look to play it through the midfield and look for this creative outlet on the floor? What if the player in this position appreciated Beckford's pace and style of play to get in behind the defenders and was able to produce the ball he'd relish. Personally I think its time to move on from Tim Cahill, I appreciate what he's done for us and his commitment, the bullying he gave out to Vidic vs Man Utd at home, the way the game changed when he came on vs Man City, but I think we'd be a lot more effective with someone creative there.