• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Court ruling: BSkyB sport channels on rival BT service

Status
Not open for further replies.

bizzaro

LOVE GOT JUST THE WAY IT IS #ALWNV
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-29911809

Game set and match to BT.

Sky have to offer the games wholesale prices to BT. This means BT customers will get skysports channels cheaper.

Having pinched first picks on Premier League games. Pinched champions league games. BT is set to finally break sky's monopoly on football on tv after 25 years.

Sky can no longer force people into subscriptions with them to see Sky Sports matches.


BSkyB sport channels can air on rival BT service, court says

UK court has ruled that pay TV broadcaster BSkyB must make its Sky Sports 1 and 2 channels available on rival BT's YouView service.

BT has been challenging BSkyB's dominance of sports broadcasting, and last year complained to the regulator, Ofcom, about airing the channels.

Ofcom first said the channels should be available to other pay TV providers four years ago.

The ruling served the interests of consumers and competition, Ofcom said.

The judgement from the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) is an interim ruling. There will be a further ruling in due course when more evidence has been assessed, but it is thought unlikely that Wednesday's decision will be undone.

Ed Richards, Ofcom's chief executive, said in a statement: "After more than four years of litigation and legal challenges, Ofcom's 2010 pay TV decision continues to serve the interests of UK consumers and this ruling is consistent with our original decision."

The majority of BT's one million TV customers are on YouView.

The company said: "BT has always maintained that Ofcom was correct to impose the 'wholesale must offer' (WMO) on Sky and this remedy remains essential to address the significant competition concerns with Sky's supply of its channels. We look forward to being able to offer these channels to our YouView customers very shortly."

However, a Sky spokesman indicated that the company would continue to challenge the ruling. "Today's judgment is a purely interim measure with no impact on the ongoing legal process or the CAT's previous dismissal of Ofcom's core argument in favour of WMO.

"Ofcom itself is reviewing WMO in light of market developments and we continue to believe that this unwarranted obligation should be removed entirely."
 

This could ultimately mean BT customers get the Sky channels at an up to 20% discount according to the Guardian.

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/05/sky-sports-bt-youview

In 2010, Ofcom first tried to force BSkyB to offer Sky Sports 1 and 2 at a 23% discount to rivals as a curb on the satellite broadcaster abusing its dominant position in the market.

The new pricing structure proposed by Ofcom is referred to as “wholesale must offer”. Last week the supreme court rejected BSkyB’s request to challenge Ofcom’s powers to impose wholesale must offer.

“BT has always maintained that Ofcom was correct to impose the ‘wholesale must offer’ on Sky and this remedy remains essential to address the significant competition concerns with Sky’s supply of its channels,” said a spokesman for BT. “We look forward to being able to offer these channels to ourYouView customers very shortly.”


Ofcom said it is now focused on reviewing the wholesale must offer remedy in light of “developments” in pay-TV, which include BT moving to spend billions of pounds to crack Sky’s stranglehold on top flight sports such as Premier League and Champion’s League football.

BSkyB said that the ruling was “purely interim” and that it would continue to fight the wholesale must offer mechanism.
 
Four years ?
Chuffin' hell, the lawyers are the real winners here6

Thanks for posting mate btw, interesting stuff.

BSKYB was used to battling underfunded smaller competitors. ESPN. Setanta.

BT is a multibillion pound monster that really takes them on.

At long last some real competition in UK market.

And the consumer should be able to get all the channels without being absolutely screwed by Sky.
 

15 euro per month for two matches every sat on bt n setanta or 37 euro per month for sky n their repetitive bellends. bt n setanta all the way
 

BSKYB was used to battling underfunded smaller competitors. ESPN. Setanta.

BT is a multibillion pound monster that really takes them on.

At long last some real competition in UK market.

And the consumer should be able to get all the channels without being absolutely screwed by Sky.

ESPN small and underfunded? They're owned by disney aren't they as well as being massive
 
BSKYB was used to battling underfunded smaller competitors. ESPN. Setanta.

BT is a multibillion pound monster that really takes them on.

At long last some real competition in UK market.

And the consumer should be able to get all the channels without being absolutely screwed by Sky.
BSKYB was used to battling underfunded smaller competitors. ESPN. Setanta.

BT is a multibillion pound monster that really takes them on.

At long last some real competition in UK market.

And the consumer should be able to get all the channels without being absolutely screwed by Sky.

These companies are always waving there cocks about behind the scenes, this will drag on for a while longer.

Would not class ESPN as a smaller competitor, even though its a mickey mouse company.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top