Champions league top four

[Topblue]

OK so when it becomes mathamatically impossible for everton not to get a top four spot, would you rather city or spurs to get in ?

Myself im In two minds, dislike city but could do without spurs getting another year of CL money to strengthen them.

 

[bluebloodinmyveins]

I hate them both, but if i had to choose it would be Spurs. I dont want City to succeed at all in anything they do.

 

[RFUS]

City.

They don't have the mentality to go too far in it, and the added money will mean nothing to them.

To Spurs, it will give them an even greater lead on ourselves.

 

[Summerskin]

City.

Just so Pienaar can do one.

 

[Topblue]

City.

They don't have the mentality to go too far in it, and the added money will mean nothing to them.

To Spurs, it will give them an even greater lead on ourselves.

Rfus have to agree money will make no difference to them.

 

[Allezfan]

I take RFUS' point but Spurs, every time.

Just because it would be hilarious that City spent so much and acheived nothing. Plus every year they win nothing and finish out of the top 4 is a year closer to the sheiks getting bored and pissing off or at least sacking their manager and selling half the team.

 

[padefc]

city all day as rfus said money means f all although i dislike them i hate spurs and everything about the self proclaimed next england manager horsehead since when did they become a sky 4 club total melts