Camera angles at footy grounds...

[Titus Bramble]

Best - White Hart Lane

Worst - Wembley

Discuss.

 

[toffeejack]

WHL is the worst, well that europa thing they do is annoying. agree with WHU.

the majority are all the same so anyone with a normal one.

 

[cooperman]

Whl seems to change a lot. Sometimes really high up (best camera angle) sometimes low or even the opposite side of the ground.

Anyone remember when ours was much lower and slightly towards one end of the pitch?

 

[BluenosePaul]

Sky are doing the whole level with the pitch camera angle which is crap.

Did it with Burnley against Chelsea.

 

[roydo]

Wembley is awful.

 

[Dithering Dougie]

WHL feels like you're on the edge of a cliff ready to fall into the tv, and they seem to miss the action when it's on the touchline in front of the gantry.

I can't think of a particular good one but that stands out as awful from my viewing perspective.

 

[Merseyzig]

Ours is good I reckon, can't think of any better. WHL is a bit too vertical for my taste, Wembley's does not reflect the grandeur of the location at all. Any angle where the far touchline is not obviously visible is not good enough for me.

St James Park is good, too. Depends on the whim of the TV directors, but you often get a good sense of how play is developing around the player in possession.

 

[riddick]

Cant remmeber the match this weekend but when they were on the far touchline, you could barely see the players. Cut off their heads, the score/time box thing was in the way, just awful.

 

[cronullasharks]

The WHL camera angle annoys me being so high up.