bizzaro
LOVE GOT JUST THE WAY IT IS #ALWNV
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-30114936
Extraordinary, that one of the men that the family division of the high court - issued a prohibition order against has claimed it was "racist" (according to SKY News)
The order and the because they were deemed a risk to an under age girl in the care of the state who has been persistently disappearing 102 times since July.
Its not racist if the state is trying to ensure that THE LAW regarding inappropriate activity with children is being addressed.
Its also important the public get to see justice is being done. That is a fundamental principle of UK law.
Just think its unbelievable some of this has been allowed to go on since 2010. No one's been able to use the law to do anything about it.
quote BBC News:
Six men banned from contact with young girls after a council became the first to use civil injunctions to block child sexual exploitation can be named, a High Court judge has said.
Mr Justice Keehan said the names of Mohammed Anjam, 31, Omar Ahmed, 27, and Mohammed Javed, 34, could be revealed.
Alam Shah, 37, Sajid Hussain, 40, and Naseem Khan, 29, can also be named.
An injunction against a seventh man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was also granted.
Police had raised concerns about the men's safety if they were identified.
After the hearing, Det Ch Supt Danny Long, head of West Midlands Police's public protection unit, said photographs of the men would not be made public.
"We are duty bound to act proportionately to the threat the men currently pose to the girl and possibly others," he said.
"We also have a duty to consider the impact of releasing the men's images on innocent family members."
The judge had granted long-term injunctions against two of the men earlier this week.
The injunctions came after social workers at Birmingham City Council and police raised concerns about the welfare of a vulnerable 17-year-old girl who is in the care of the council.
The judge barred the men from approaching the girl until she turned 18 following a public hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in London.
He also barred them from approaching "any female under 18", with whom they were not personally associated.
Lorna Meyer QC, for Birmingham City Council, said the authority and police had identified a "number of individuals" found to be "inappropriately" in the company of the 17-year-old girl.
Lawyers thought there was not enough evidence to secure criminal convictions - on a beyond reasonable doubt basis - "at the current time".
But they thought there was enough evidence to obtain civil court injunctions - on a balance of probabilities basis.
Extraordinary, that one of the men that the family division of the high court - issued a prohibition order against has claimed it was "racist" (according to SKY News)
The order and the because they were deemed a risk to an under age girl in the care of the state who has been persistently disappearing 102 times since July.
Its not racist if the state is trying to ensure that THE LAW regarding inappropriate activity with children is being addressed.
Its also important the public get to see justice is being done. That is a fundamental principle of UK law.
Just think its unbelievable some of this has been allowed to go on since 2010. No one's been able to use the law to do anything about it.
quote BBC News:
Six men banned from contact with young girls after a council became the first to use civil injunctions to block child sexual exploitation can be named, a High Court judge has said.
Mr Justice Keehan said the names of Mohammed Anjam, 31, Omar Ahmed, 27, and Mohammed Javed, 34, could be revealed.
Alam Shah, 37, Sajid Hussain, 40, and Naseem Khan, 29, can also be named.
An injunction against a seventh man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was also granted.
Police had raised concerns about the men's safety if they were identified.
After the hearing, Det Ch Supt Danny Long, head of West Midlands Police's public protection unit, said photographs of the men would not be made public.
"We are duty bound to act proportionately to the threat the men currently pose to the girl and possibly others," he said.
"We also have a duty to consider the impact of releasing the men's images on innocent family members."
The judge had granted long-term injunctions against two of the men earlier this week.
The injunctions came after social workers at Birmingham City Council and police raised concerns about the welfare of a vulnerable 17-year-old girl who is in the care of the council.
The judge barred the men from approaching the girl until she turned 18 following a public hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in London.
He also barred them from approaching "any female under 18", with whom they were not personally associated.
Lorna Meyer QC, for Birmingham City Council, said the authority and police had identified a "number of individuals" found to be "inappropriately" in the company of the 17-year-old girl.
Lawyers thought there was not enough evidence to secure criminal convictions - on a beyond reasonable doubt basis - "at the current time".
But they thought there was enough evidence to obtain civil court injunctions - on a balance of probabilities basis.
.
