Barkley or Naismith

[bizzaro]

Barkley, easily.

The Villa game shows us how much he can give us if we actually play him in his proper position.

Its not even a Barkley v Naismith debate.

Let Barkley play a little deeper.

 

[toffee matt]

Its not even a Barkley v Naismith debate.

Let Barkley play a little deeper.

It is because they both share the behind the striker role as their best position

 

[royalblue66]

ross by a mile.

naismith doesn't do anything other than pop up with a goal now and again and he's too slow.

Looking like everyone is in the firing line

 

[Boss_Blue]

Its not even a Barkley v Naismith debate.

Let Barkley play a little deeper.

In time lid.


In time.

 

[keith_78]

I would have been happy with that yesterday.

so would i but point is he didn't and didn't offer anything else in the game

 

[matty1878]

Barkley because he drives at teams. We needed him there Yday from kick off not on the wing

 

[Eric Djemba-Djemba]

Its not even a Barkley v Naismith debate.

Let Barkley play a little deeper.

There's no need to break up Barry and McCarthy. It's either Barkley or Naismith mate and Barkley wins mate.

 

[peteblue]

Naismith until he plays [Poor language removed]... Then Ross until he plays [Poor language removed] then Naismith again

This with bells on.......

 

[Azza]

Barkley or Eto'o.

 

[quasi modo]

Barkley behind Lukaku, with McGeady and Pienaar on the flanks for the Sunderland game.

 

[bizzaro]

Naismith until he plays [Poor language removed]... Then Ross until he plays [Poor language removed] then Naismith again

lol

 

[barneygumble]

Barkley clearly isn't match fit, and it was evident yesterday, as i believe he was probably our worst player on the pitch, that said, if you'd have asked us all 12 months ago, you'd have laughed thinking it was a Kopite being a WUM, yet I was asked that about 5-6 times yesterday.

Naismith, deserves all the praise he's received for his early season form, but for him to play week in, week out, is simply implausible, it already seems like he's running on fumes already, however i'm not knocking the lad, but when you ask the question of whether you'd rather have potentially our most influential player, in Barkley or a Workhorse like Naismith, surely there is only one answer, Barkley, who on the wing is absolute tosh.

However, it's what Naisy is there for, he's a great option, but there is no question in my mind!

 

[Lids1978]

Long term Barkley with Naismith coming on for him last twenty or whenever. Naismith is actually a deadly impact sub.