Search results for query: *

That's an important point - there are regulations here and in the US about releasing material non-public information that may affect share prices for example. Apart from playing with a poker-face - those involved have to be careful they don't get accused of market manipulation. In fact, it...

Probably doesn't work hard enough off the ball for Dyche. But it gets boring blaming managers for everything - maybe Danjuma just isn't that interested.

We do ? How do we know that ? But yeah, I have sympathy for him and Dyche - can't help feeling they are running the football side of the club on their own.

Would seem weird to make that statement and leave the club. To his credit - he seemed to get a good price for Gordon at the time.

Only just read his statement - so we are definitely selling then. Hopefully him and Sean are thinking about what keeps us in the PL next season - because the only reasons we survived this one were players like Branthwaite and Pickford.

He's just another sports 'journalist' talking guesswork really isn't he - just in his own style of ''financial expert'. He comes across as a bit 'internet educated' at times - I wonder if he is making anything out of all this attention ? Assume so.

It is getting quite funny - with all these red flags the PL are going to look pretty stupid with their fit and proper persons test if they allow it to proceed.

I'm not a big fan of any of the players mentioned - but loaning them on didn't turn our squad into world beaters either. I guess my point is - we would likely be forfeiting some of Betos wages to make it attractive - so you end up paying a lot more for his replacement - in a round about way...

sorry, meant to reply to this and got side-tracked. What's been happening a lot during the Mosh era is we'd attract players with generous PL wages, give up on them within a season or two and then loan them at a reduced rate to poorer clubs abroad. Sandro Ramirez, Dele Alli, Cenk Tosun, Andre...

But with current sanctions, you wouldn't be able to give that money to Uzzy - so I just wondered whether 777 had a way to get some to him on a drip.

It's not too outrageous. Personally think this is likely to be the other way around - It's not so much about Uzzy putting money in - maybe 777 and its shells is a way of moving money out or washing cash.

The only probable Everton resolution to this is that we plod along, month to month with 777 as owners - wondering if we'll be able to pay the next bill.

If anything - now they have something in common.

Difficult to know how it would have affected the team. Althought there does seem to be a siege mentality in the squad.

Somebody needs to negotiate those sales though !

I'm not an expert - but it sounds more like a mortgage in principal - The PL have accepted it 'IF X, Y, Z'. If those criteria aren't met then the mortgage is withdrawn. 777 haven't been able to meet X, Y, Z criteria so here we are - waiting for them to sort it out - but I don't know that...

AFAIK they established some criteria that would be an acceptance in principal.

No, but there seems to be an open-ended timeline on that..

Innocent until proven guilty.

It's a pleasant day outside. Don't ruin it by asking.