To be fair you also earlier said Danny Ings is really good so maybe you’re just on the lemo
- Status
To be fair you also earlier said Danny Ings is really good so maybe you’re just on the lemo
KaiserEFC
Player Valuation: £70m
I actually said he’s “good”, not “really good” and I think after scoring 18 goals so far this season that is fair. That’s not me saying we should sign him it’s just me saying he’s a good striker
TheBigIguana
Player Valuation: £90m
This Kulusevski on Parma can really play
sw blue
Player Valuation: £6m
I think we actually went in for him quite hard around the turn of the year. There were a few reports, but if it never got major coverage. I think we were a little late to the party, despite him being exactly what Brands was looking for.
Oasis1878
Player Valuation: £30m
Stones must be bad if he can’t get in ahead of Otamendi. Dreadful defender him
orly
Please check with me for Blammo criteria
orly
Please check with me for Blammo criteria
Win the footballs
carolinablue232
Player Valuation: £70m
Expected to buy Koulibaly aren’t they? Him plus keeping Laporte, otamendi, and Garcia, and they’re more than fine.
again
Good recruitment isn't just about buying players who may have more ability than your current team. We need to buy players who have something to prove are hungry and fit in with the culture of what we are trying to achieve. Mentality is key. Hate to say it, but just like Liverpool. Stones would see us as a backward step, without question, and have zero motivation. He would literally have to be forced to take the move due to lack of interest elsewhere, which again raises huge alarm bells. Just because someone isnt good enough for City, doesnt mean he isnt good enough for Everton, I understand that to a degree. But for that to work, a player has to be in a different phase of his career. We should be buying players who can be bought by City in the future, or perhaps even fulfil their ambitions with us. Not the other way round.
If John Stones was as good as you say he is, Man City wouldn't be selling him. They are 25 points behind Liverpool for a reason, and it isn't because of their attacking prowess. You may say that Stones has hardly played - due to injuries and lack of form, which just reiterates the fact that we shouldn't buy him.
Good recruitment isn't just about buying players who may have more ability than your current team. We need to buy players who have something to prove are hungry and fit in with the culture of what we are trying to achieve. Mentality is key. Hate to say it, but just like Liverpool. Stones would see us as a backward step, without question, and have zero motivation. He would literally have to be forced to take the move due to lack of interest elsewhere, which again raises huge alarm bells. Just because someone isnt good enough for City, doesnt mean he isnt good enough for Everton, I understand that to a degree. But for that to work, a player has to be in a different phase of his career. We should be buying players who can be bought by City in the future, or perhaps even fulfil their ambitions with us. Not the other way round.
Mitch Ward's Minder
Player Valuation: £5m
I remember Kaka absolutely running the show against Manure in 07 to get to the CL final. Best player in Europe from about 05-08 hands down
I loved Kaka even in Orlando with his blacked out Copa’s and that beautiful head of hair.
mkrudden
Player Valuation: £40m
MATE?!
Had season tickets, I confirm this.
Zezti
Player Valuation: £70m
He's 38 now and I'd still have him here.
- Status
