Confirmed Signing Tyler Dibling

Status
Not open for further replies.

Honestly baffled how some of you are so clueless about how percentage sell on works in deals like this.

Is this your first day on earth? Never watched football before?

Honestly baffles me. It's really not that difficult. It's been explained a million times and yet you STILL cant grasp it.
Best one is someone a couple of pages back explaining the figures based on % of profit, then other posters telling him he's wrong as it should be based on % of profit 🤯
 
Honestly baffled how some of you are so clueless about how percentage sell on works in deals like this.

Is this your first day on earth? Never watched football before?

Honestly baffles me. It's really not that difficult. It's been explained a million times and yet you STILL cant grasp it.
Makes a nice change from people asking how many loans are available on every page
 
People massively overcomplicate sell-on fees, but it’s actually dead simple. Basically, when a club puts a sell-on clause in a deal, they get a chunk every single time the player moves clubs for the rest of his career. Doesn’t matter if he’s 18 or 38, if he’s going for £100m or a free transfer to League Two, the original club gets their cut. It’s like a lifetime subscription.
We should be doing it more often when we get a fee for a player.
 

👀

From what I read, one of us wants to see Grealish with more than one person on him, I don't. So, no. I want defenders isolated, allowing Grealish and Dibling to do their thing with minimal fuss.
I think the other post was a tongue in cheek response intimating exactly that, but using Grealish as an example where doubling up on any of them will produce more space for the others... I don't think he 'literally' meant he hopes Grealish is always doubled up on. But there again, you probably know this and are just been pedantic to be right on the Internet 👍
 
Deal seems a lot better if its true its 35 plus 5 in add ons...

The sell on only happens if hes delivering on the pitch so I don't mind that per se
I could see us trying to settle that sell on within the next two years, especially if Southampton don't keep producing assets to sell.

The TFG seem opportunistic and I think they'll be monitoring Southamptons finances for an opportunity to settle for a quick cash injection.
 

I have to ask: how does watching a football match help people learn how sell-on % works?
Because people whi watch football generally have some idea how these things work as sell on percentages are fairly common.

People who don't watch football are more than likely clueless how they work.

Sell on percentages have been around for a very long time now.
 
People massively overcomplicate sell-on fees, but it’s actually dead simple. Basically, when a club puts a sell-on clause in a deal, they get a chunk every single time the player moves clubs for the rest of his career. Doesn’t matter if he’s 18 or 38, if he’s going for £100m or a free transfer to League Two, the original club gets their cut. It’s like a lifetime subscription.
We should be doing it more often when we get a fee for a player.

Assume you're taking the mick. A sell on clause only relates to a single transfer contract between club A selling to club B. Now when club B sells to club C they could ask club A to give up some of their money in return for a % of a future sell on but thats up to the clubs.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top