• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Today’s Football 25/26 Season


True. But it’s a law that is never, ever implemented. Here’s a video of all of last seasons free-kick goals. All 3 of the first ones had at least one “attacking player within 1m of the wall”, which PMGOL are saying is the reason Palace’s goal was ruled out for.

And ironically, two of the first three goals scored in the video are by Chelsea, in the very goal that Palace had one ruled out for today. With the third being against Bournemouth, in the last minute of the game, even though two Chelsea players are leaning into the wall.

It’s true what people said, if today’s goal was scored by Chelsea, there is zero chance it would have been ruled out.


First goal the players are a metre away from the ball. The defender isn’t part of the wall. Second there are only two players in the wall which means you can be as close as you want as an attacker. Rule only comes in if there are 3 or more players in the wall. Third one I agree with you.

Really don’t know why people are getting so upset about it. It was the correct decision. It might be a stupid rule but they got it right here. If there are loads of examples of them getting it wrong then fair enough but from that video I’ve seen one.
 


First goal the players are a metre away from the ball. The defender isn’t part of the wall. Second there are only two players in the wall which means you can be as close as you want as an attacker. Rule only comes in if there are 3 or more players in the wall. Third one I agree with you.

Really don’t know why people are getting so upset about it. It was the correct decision. It might be a stupid rule but they got it right here. If there are loads of examples of them getting it wrong then fair enough but from that video I’ve seen one.
The first one? There are clearly 2 attacking players within 1m of what I would assume would be classified as the “wall”. It’s a 6 man wall, all defending players are standing next to each other in a defined line, and the 2 Man U players are leaning into it:
IMG_0019.webp

The second one yeah, only 2 defenders so not a wall.

But I’d argue that there are other examples in the video, hard to judge on some but Maguire clearly within 1m of the Everton wall also:

IMG_0020.webp

I don’t personally think it’s a “stupid” rule, I’d just want to see the law applied consistently. There may not be loads of examples, but I’m sure there are loads more free-kicks where there has been players within 1m when a goal has NOT been scored, but if there had, they wouldn’t have looked twice at it.
 
The first one? There are clearly 2 attacking players within 1m of what I would assume would be classified as the “wall”. It’s a 6 man wall, all defending players are standing next to each other in a defined line, and the 2 Man U players are leaning into it:
View attachment 321680

The second one yeah, only 2 defenders so not a wall.

But I’d argue that there are other examples in the video, hard to judge on some but Maguire clearly within 1m of the Everton wall also:

View attachment 321681

I don’t personally think it’s a “stupid” rule, I’d just want to see the law applied consistently. There may not be loads of examples, but I’m sure there are loads more free-kicks where there has been players within 1m when a goal has NOT been scored, but if there had, they wouldn’t have looked twice at it.

Is it a new rule? Think the games today were the first time I've seen the 1 metre spray put down before.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top