Confirmed Signing Jack Grealish

[blulouie]

True ATM - just poor speculation .....

As it stands whoever takes him on it will cost circa 15 mil for one year.
Whether that's paying his wages or paying a loan fee and City paying half wages.

 

[Joey66]

As it stands whoever takes him on it will cost circa 15 mil for one year.
Whether that's paying his wages or paying a loan fee and City paying half wages.

City allegedly have stated they want full wages paying ?

 

[HappyJack]

Im pretty sure we will pay the loan fee. Grealish brings excitement, puts our name about. Lifts the club.Someone earlier posted that we spent in one year close to 50m on Gbamin….

 

[blulouie]

City allegedly have stated they want full wages paying ?

Yes
£15 mil per year.

 

[ToffeeTim]

No one is going to pay Grealish's full wages of like 16m

They can keep asking but no one will pay it.

 

[Blue peter]

Ok, double is bluff but 65k to 39k

It’s a moot point, spurs have completely out classed us this last twenty years if we are honest - and still won nothing. Better managers, players and spells in Europe

They get 61k, next season we’ll get 53k

 

[jazzy]

With Spurs sniffing around it's becoming likely that you them or another club offer to fully pay his wages before the transfer window shuts.

Although it's not worked out for him at City I think if he goes to the right club who allow him to express himself he'll flourish.

Absolutely no evidence for that assumption at all MRM.

 

[carolinablue232]

City allegedly have stated they want full wages paying ?

Correct Joey. So full wages being what they are it’s 15mil which would be the same as paying half of them plus a 7.5mil loan fee. Structure it how you want, it’s 15mil minimum.

 

[Maine road Man]

I think the longer it goes the less you get, there’s no way Everton will pay it and apparently spurs feel that it’s to much , so you’re struggling who else is out there , that can afford 300k a week.

There isn't a loan fee though. And if you or another club agree to paying his wages for next two seasons you won't have paid a transfer fee either, and will be able to negotiate a new contract on less money.

Like I said earlier if Everton owners have big ambitions they'll have to pay big fees and wages, or Everton will carry on being mediocre in paying good money for mediocre players, like you have for several seasons.

 

[Kevsleftpeg]

There isn't a loan fee though. And if you or another club agree to paying his wages for next two seasons you won't have paid a transfer fee either, and will be able to negotiate a new contract on less money.

Like I said earlier if Everton owners have big ambitions they'll have to pay big fees and wages, or Everton will carry on being mediocre in paying good money for mediocre players, like you have for several seasons.

Grealish isn’t worth the money. Nowhere near.

 

[blueboy72]

City are interested in a W Ham star midfielder they are using Grealish as bait so rumours say ?

we can never pay is wages 300K on a loan deal - so move on if City wont compromise ?

We will get him for 10mil deal imo. No chance he goes to West Ham

 

[Jebus_lives]

There isn't a loan fee though. And if you or another club agree to paying his wages for next two seasons you won't have paid a transfer fee either, and will be able to negotiate a new contract on less money.

Like I said earlier if Everton owners have big ambitions they'll have to pay big fees and wages, or Everton will carry on being mediocre in paying good money for mediocre players, like you have for several seasons.

I don't think anyone disputes that. The question is, should we pay it for Grealish?

 

[blueboy72]

There isn't a loan fee though. And if you or another club agree to paying his wages for next two seasons you won't have paid a transfer fee either, and will be able to negotiate a new contract on less money.

Like I said earlier if Everton owners have big ambitions they'll have to pay big fees and wages, or Everton will carry on being mediocre in paying good money for mediocre players, like you have for several seasons.

We won’t be paying his 300k a week wages I can guarantee you that mate
We offer city 200k basically 10mil late in the window, city will snap our hands off.
The only other way is if Grealish Takes the hit himself

 

[JammyP]

Yes
£15 mil per year.

Would he be worth £45m on a 3 year contract with no sell on value?

Not that I have any spare millions, but I would think so

 

[Maine road Man]

I don't think anyone disputes that. The question is, should we pay it for Grealish?

I think he has bags of talent, but Pep has stifled his talent by keeping him on the left wing. He's a old fashioned inside left.

He's worth taking a gamble on because when Jack is on form he's a joy to watch. He's also a confidence player, it's as though his game is bi-polar. City haven't seen the best of him and Grealish could and should have produced much more than he has.