Confirmed Signing Tyler Dibling

[Rooney_Tunes]

Mate Dibling is like our 5th choice

Just tell them to fo.

It's not difficult.

 

[Rooney_Tunes]

50 mill flat. No add-ons. No percentage of any future transfer fee.

If not, walk away.

Pretty sure you were thinking the same at 40M...

Time to PIVOT!!!

 

[Dddddd]

Not sure why people are surprised by us wanting a sell on clause. Pretty standard for young talent with a lot of potential isn't it?

I'm surprised we didn't accept the £40m though. 50m is too steep I reckon and means you'll be on the wrong end of the risk/reward ratio.

I think most Evertonians think Southampton are entitled to ask for it, just like Everton have a price on Branthwaite.

But don’t want to pay it!

 

[Loadsofchemistry]

Southampton are just posturing like Scott Steiner.

See if you take our £45mil, plus another 5 million in add ons, then you take Southamptons 25% sell on fee, their chances of selling the player drastically go down.

But our recruitment team are like psycho Sid, “we are twice the club you are and we have half the brains you do”

 

[mahermi1]

He had an agreement that he could leave this summer and only had a year on his contract.

Make an agreement with the player for when his contract runs out, he improves his game, becomes more experienced and we get him for nothing. We then have an outstanding player for the future, we think ahead, oh and then buy their replacement, Fellows from Westbrom, he will do for the next two years and further piss Southampton off. Job done.

 

[Kevsleftpeg]

I think most Evertonians think Southampton are entitled to ask for it, just like Everton have a price on Branthwaite.

But don’t want to pay it!

They're not entitled to continually increase what they will accept after we have matched what they were asking for. That's poor form in a negotiation.

 

[toffeeblue9]

HaView attachment 319939

Where's the screen shot from?

That's not his twitter handle and he's not on threads.

 

[Exeter_Gently]

Where's the screen shot from?

That's not his twitter handle and he's not on threads.

It's on Bluesky.

 

[raiseyoureyebrow4thewin!]

50 mill flat. No add-ons. No percentage of any future transfer fee.

If not, walk away.

risk is greater with higher up front, cuz he can fail and then u lose your pants.
hence the sell on percentage is less damaging when he has realized his potential and we sell him for 2-3x.

42.5m with 25% sell on last offer, I think we close there or walk away.

 

[Rothanaa]

Time to walk away. They won't ever see that amount of money for him ever again. He will probably run down his contract or be sold for cheap due the time remaining on his contract.

 

[Caso01]

Not sure why people are surprised by us wanting a sell on clause. Pretty standard for young talent with a lot of potential isn't it?

I'm surprised we didn't accept the £40m though. 50m is too steep I reckon and means you'll be on the wrong end of the risk/reward ratio.

You seen sensible mate.
Any chance of taking over negotiations?

 

[degsy]

If we do sign him somebody, somewhere must be really, really, keen in him and the fee turns out to be 'Undisclosed' - we have had our pants pulled down good style.

Whoever the main driver is on this, they'd better hope he turns out shizhot

 

[TheNinja]

I don't have a problem with 25% of future profit, rather than 25% of future sale, but £50m could do so much more for us in 2 or 3 areas. It depends whether this is it, or we still have funds earmarked or if we're just going to look at loan market after Dibling?

As much as I want him, we're getting to tipping point with it.

 

[Dddddd]

They're not entitled to continually increase what they will accept after we have matched what they were asking for. That's poor form in a negotiation.

The outcome will determine if they were correct or not

They want to maximise revenue for themselves

It’s just how business works

 

[Bedfordblue]

just dropping this in here…..