Probably fair to say prices seem to have gone one way.
Context considering, we're pretty desperate too.
I think at £15-20mil he'd have been a good signing for a relegation threatened side to add balance.
For a team with 'supposed' aspirations of rapid improvement I am disappointed.
I think he will be on the left side of midfield (eventual replacement of Gana) with Garner on the right side.
I can see Garner being ousted over the next couple of seasons by Armstrong. If we signed Dewsbury-Hall today and then a left sided Armstrong 'profile' then it would make some sense.
Then we have 2 average CMs with 2 highly promising young players pushing for a place behind them. A strategy, continuity, potential growth.
As it stands Dewsbury-Hall & Garner over the next e.g 2 seasons doesnt scream 'X Factor' and while i like both players as all rounders, its not revolutionary.
£28mil is super high for a player unwanted at his club. A loan would have been logical or a lower cost.
It's gonna be £25m+5
So 5m more than when you previously wanted him.
You got slapped down just move on.
"Slapped down"?
Why dont you, "move on".
£25mil + £5mil = £30mil
£15mil-£20mil is circa half of that price.
He was very good for a Leicester team that should have got champions league, finished 5th, he was signed for 30 mil for Chelsea. He still only 26, Brownhill didn’t play a prem game till he was 24 and no team have come in for him.
He'll be 27 next month and the age doesnt really matter to me as we need a balance. Not arguing with his ability or what he brings to the team....just the cost is mad and there is better out there.
As I messaged higher up, if we had:
Dewsbury-Hall / Rigg
Garner / Armstrong
With Gana also in there, then it makes sense to me. But in isolation, poor.
We buying Onana too?
That was from 2023
