• Participation within this 'World Football' is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Crystal Palace and the Europa League


Yeah, I’m sure you would have been very prominent with your “sorry but rules are rules” when Everton had their points deduction.
You’ve been outed as a troll. Feck Off.

no i'm not. We broke the rules and were charged. No issue with that. The punishment, and the fact we were first were over the top.

Then the fact the punishment wasn't standard and up to 3 peoples interpretation was ridiculous.

Yours is pretty simple. No 2 clubs can play in the same comp if owned by the same person, or a person with significant interest.

Slam dunk
 
no i'm not. We broke the rules and were charged. No issue with that. The punishment, and the fact we were first were over the top.

Then the fact the punishment wasn't standard and up to 3 peoples interpretation was ridiculous.

Yours is pretty simple. No 2 clubs can play in the same comp if owned by the same person, or a person with significant interest.

Slam dunk
IMG_9250.webp
 

Not a fan of these multi club ownership models tbh but it's incredibly harsh on Palace. I guarantee if it was a bigger club they'd let them in
The city group were forced to make changes by a deadline last season with Girona. They did it.

Forest made the changed by the deadline.

Palace didn’t. It’s really that simple. I feel for the fans but as other users have pointed out, this is on the ownership.

Despite how much I dislike them, I can understand why forest would be annoyed if they had sorted their ownership situation out on time only for Palace to break that rule and not face punishment.

You either for the rules of the game being implemented or not. You cant cry out when you feel like a ‘big’ club is getting away with it and then say oh it’s unfair on Palace.
 

The city group were forced to make changes by a deadline last season with Girona. They did it.

Forest made the changed by the deadline.

Palace didn’t. It’s really that simple. I feel for the fans but as other users have pointed out, this is on the ownership.

Despite how much I dislike them, I can understand why forest would be annoyed if they had sorted their ownership situation out on time only for Palace to break that rule and not face punishment.

You either for the rules of the game being implemented or not. You cant cry out when you feel like a ‘big’ club is getting away with it and then say oh it’s unfair on Palace.
🤣 Another one delighted when Everton were charged. Were you on here with the “rules are rules” jabber then?
 
Steve Paris didn’t disagree with Everton being charged. On talk sport when asked about PSR he said ‘rules are rules’.

Maybe he should have spent less time on talk sport and more times checking his emails
IMG_9258.webp
Your post ( like your other posts on this subject) doesn’t appear to be entirely accurate now, does it?
 
Last edited:
View attachment 317056
Your post ( like your other posts on this subject) doesn’t appear to be entirely accurate now, does it?
Rather than using an AI generated summary. Watch the interview:

4.55 in. He says he feels sorry for clubs and is glad deductions didn’t result in relegation but rules are rules. Even if you disagree with them or think they’re unfair and they should be applied evenly.

I feel sorry for Palace. But how is it fair for Forrest to follow the rules and ensure the use of a blind trust but Palace dont and then still don’t get punished? This is completely on the Palace board. If your ownership had got their house in order by the deadline then it’s a non-issue.

You’ve not been treated unfairly. This rule has been applied fairly across all clubs in the competition.
 

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top