No it doesn't.Sounds like the Huge Dxxk Stadium. Awful name. Just call it the New Goodison Park.
No it doesn't.Sounds like the Huge Dxxk Stadium. Awful name. Just call it the New Goodison Park.
If naming the stadium after Lukaku gets him to re-sign for us, it would be worth it.Sounds like the Huge Dxxk Stadium.
Its better than a betting sponsor, gulf state airline or advertising countries with dubious human rights records.
A local brand with a respectable history.
Dont be scared of the dick now lads
connotations*…The Briefs, The Rex Makin, The Court.
I suppose The Dock also has legal conectations.
connotations*
Even though I know this is from 'Stay', I'm going with 'Ecuador' for some Saturday midday 90's euro dance. @LostLegendHad a dream last night that we adopted the name "The Hill", and i didn't like it one bit![]()
Excuse me chief, we've got legalese sponsorship involved now, everything needs to be above board and ship shape. Perukes in the club shop coming soon...….bit ignorant, its a footy forum not a report for Whitehall, I’d have thought posters knew what was meant.
If their revenue is 140m per year and they pay us 10m per year how much do you think their revenue will be in 2 years time?I wish I was gullible enough to believe the club spin that 'could be up to £10m' actually means £10m a year.
It's nowhere near that figure. HD revenue is only £140m a year.
If it was such a great deal, why has the fella in charge of commercial just been booted out?
I don't think image and perception are a thing here though. I don't look at Arsenal or Man City more favourably because of who sponsors their ground. Plenty of clubs don't even have ground sponsors (or obvious ones anyway).Image, perception, less ridicule , better sounding ‘name’ ? I am playing Devils advocate here to a certain extent . My instinct when I first heard was ‘o no ‘ not as arsed now but would like to see finer details of what we are getting in payment exactly