Bob Elstone
Player Valuation: £35m
I'd tell Leeds, if you do us a favour and take back Harrison we'll give you the non goalscoring DCL free.
Giving him a 3y contract for £120k per week is financially no different to signing a ‘back up’ striker for £9m on £64k per week.If we have to keep one of Beto or DCL due to PSR whatnots, then clearly keep the guy who's actually been scoring.
Also, why give DCL a new contract on £100k++ pw and then sign a new starter to play ahead of him? Surely makes more sense to keep Big B for the backup role. Doubt DCL would be happy to play second fiddle in any case (when he's fit like =).
Why PL is better with Leeds in it . I might be biased but I think with what's happened to both Man U and Tottenham this season and Forest doing well a more competitive environment is better. We haven't had an out and out goal scorer since we sold Wood to Burnley.Sell Beto to Italy if we do sell him. We don't want him helping keep Leeds up
Maybe so, but the second point was would DCL be so interested in sticking around to largely bench-warm if we signed the likes of Delap as a new main man?Giving him a 3y contract for £120k per week is financially no different to signing a ‘back up’ striker for £9m on £64k per week.
Both cost around £18m over 3 years.
We committed more financially to Maupey and he certainly wasn’t our first choice striker.
Obviously no one really knows how much he would be after but the principle is the same up to a certain wage.
I need to see your workings out on this one? Horrible club and fans. The northern Millwall except Millwall have a far better strip.Why PL is better with Leeds in it
Interesting. I would keep him and coach him. He's not wanting for physicality and attitude and he is starting to bag goals.Giving him a 3y contract for £120k per week is financially no different to signing a ‘back up’ striker for £9m on £64k per week.
Both cost around £18m over 3 years.
We committed more financially to Maupey and he certainly wasn’t our first choice striker.
Obviously no one really knows how much he would be after but the principle is the same up to a certain wage.
Beto has been far superior this seasonMuch rather keep Beto than DCL
Agreed, but his injury record suggests he would be 2nd choice by default / availability.Maybe so, but the second point was would DCL be so interested in sticking around to largely bench-warm if we signed the likes of Delap as a new main man?
Aside from that, Beto has vastly outscored him this season.
He'd only sit on the bench if we don't sign a decent wide player or half creative midfield player. He might end up with double figures and that in a team that basically hoofs the ball aimlessly in his general direction. If he'd played this season in a team that created a decent amount of through balls and crosses from the dead ball line he could easily have scored15+We’d be daft not to take the money on this one really if a bid came in. He’s never going to push on to be an out and out first choice striker for a team pushing to move up the table. If we are signing a striker, recouping some of if not all of the outlay seems a no-brainer if we keep DCL.
If he sits on the bench next season, what happens to his value? If someone comes in he should be the one that leaves, netting us a fee.