6 + 2 Point Deductions

[Exeter_Gently]

Am gona absolutely batter someone.

 

[Goat]

I suppose you gotta be happy with 2, others will disagree, but the 6 for the first breach is the 1 that stands out the most, thats a complete farce.

 

[Daytripper]

How people have defended the charlatans at Everton is beyond me

 

[lieneverton]

Starting point of 5. But I thought the starting point was 3 as per Forests deduction?

Its impressive how regularly they've proved themselves to have no idea what they're doing.

The case for independent oversight has been spectacularly made this season.

 

[Smurph]

so did my wifi mate

The code is real!

Utter nonsense Numberwang continues. Glad we are appealing.

 

[MikeH72]

So the Ukraine mitigations were accepted in his time but not for the first breach? What?

 

[Blue83]

Starting point of 5. But I thought the starting point was 3 as per Forests deduction?

5 for us, 3 for everyone else

 

[Jacko93]

I

it was £121.6m. The threshold is zero

No, the target is 0. The threshold is £105 over 3 years. Have you read nothing?

 

[JimmyK]

Let’s see what this weak club do and say now

They've already said they're appealing serious question what do people think they should do go on strike or what? They've been charged twice and appealed twice why do people keep saying they're just accepting it?

 

[GoldenToffee]

16.6m over this time.

So the TOTAL of our two breaches barely exceeds Forest’s one. 8-4 on points.

Think there is scope for the appeal.

Yeah but the appeal won't in any way look at our first breach and use that in our mitigation. They'll look at it as a breach of 16m and a punishment of -2, which they'll deem more than fair compared to Forest.

Hell, this might even lead to Forest being given 2 points back now they've 'only' docked us a further 2 ...

 

[PrekisCrossBarlow!]

So Everton have eight points deducted this season, and this summer deductions will be removed as a punishment.

Utterly scandalous and we should appeal with proper fury. Puking with rage here tbh.

 

[matty1878]

Yeah but the appeal won't in any way look at our first breach and use that in our mitigation. They'll look at it as a breach of 16m and a punishment of -2, which they'll deem more than fair compared to Forest.

Hell, this might even lead to Forest being given 2 points back now they've 'only' docked us a further 2 ...

behave

 

[b-rad]

No, the target is 0. The threshold is £105 over 3 years. Have you read nothing?

Surely the target is actually a profit rather than just breaking even?

 

[Goat]

So the Ukraine mitigations were accepted in his time but not for the first breach? What?

Im just guessing here, but last time we didnt have any reduction of revenue due to the Ukraine war, this time we did.

As I say, im just guessing till I read the report Mike.

 

[Ring master]

Predicted 4 back on 1st one way before 4 was mentioned, thought 2/3 on this one, thought by 2pm today. had Everton to win 1-0 saturday. That all proves you can get something right once in a while