This is the issue, the longer this goes on player sales is inevitable, unable to buy anyone.... it`s certain relegation next season.
Would anyone back this squad less Branthwaite, Onana and all the out of contract and loan players to stay up...
These loans are circa 40m a time.
The PL stipulations to finalise the purchase are that, 777 must pay MSP 150m, provide the club with 60m in an Escrow and provide funding for the balance of the stadium. Combined circa 400m.
They're clearly able...
More than likely "rejection" is the purchaser saying they are walking away from the deal due to the process taking too long, which is what happened the first time the Saudi's were "rejected" by the Premier League.
The controversial £300m...
5,500 hospitality, up from 1,500 we have now. They wont be included in the figures mentioned though, there separate.
Assuming current hospitality members renew, that leaves 4k new. Bear in mind though, that the club has also sold them to people...
Spot on Sam. Boxes are good for companies for a bunch of employees who know each other, but in some cases it results in sharing a small buffet in an enclosed space with people you’ve never met before.
Everton took advice from Liverpool, Arsenal, City and Spurs regarding boxes. All said that the revenue for that type of match day experience was declining because
a) guests weren't getting the same match day experience with 10 people in a box...
Stadium interest is ok, but thats assuming the 777 loans are going to the stadium. If its working capital for everyday running of the club, it will cause us a problem.
Keep seeing huge amounts of interest being mentioned, but the reality is that if that was the rate, we will fail FFP again. The P&L simply doesnt have the room to fund that.
If 777 believe they will pass the O&D tests, then it would be counter...
209. First, the benchmarks relied upon by the Club, notably the EFL P&S Rules and EFL Guidelines. The EFL Guidelines reflect the extent of the breach in money terms. They have a starting point of 12 points, but that is “top down”: excluding...