They weren't trying to take advantage, they were just cash-starved after the Ukraine invasion and largely incompetent.
Agreed though, being nice had nothing to do with it.
I copied and pasted the quoted text. Directly from your link. I'm really trying not to name call here, but you're either blind or just a wind up.
It literally says, in the revenue bullet points, "Profit from player sales." From your link...
Dude!!! It says it right in your link:
You sum up the first group, which are expenses.
You sum up the second group, which are revenues (THAT INCLUDES PLAYER SALES)
You get your SCR percentage.
I put the point of contention in bold, italics...
It does. I provided two separate links from two separate sources.
I don't need to catch on, I have two eyes and reading comprehension.
Have a good day.
I did not say they were the same, I said they treat player costs similarly. I think I counted me typing "they are different" at least three times.
Your article doesn't mention the components of SCR. I'm actually not sure what point you're...
1. They are both adjusted profitability measures. Both remove some expenses from the equation, but they're both based on revenues and certain expenses. SCR presents this as a percentage, but it is still a measure of profitability (Squad...
I think you can make the case it's a women's team expense but:
1. You don't know how long that exception will last
2. You don't get the sugar rush of a huge capital injection.
They are different measures (70% squad cost vs profitability), and they have somewhat different components, but the player cost aspects are similar.
If you sell a player, the profit from that sale (sale price-remaining amortized fee) is profit...