In the last few pages hes been described as a fast player with no pace, a good defender who cant tackle and has a great engine but struggles for fitness in the last 20 mins. Hes everton alright!
I take your point but walcott over the last 18 months could have been replaced with 3 or 4 young players with virtually no difference in results. I'd love to sit down with these managers and get them to explain it
I've always wondered why managers go with underperforming players rather than try youth. It might not work but if your senior player is garbage why not chance it. Howard and Robles with martinez springs to mind. Robles might not have been the answer but howard certainly wasnt. Why not go with...