Exactly, I would be within my rights as a landlord, but I’d be a bit of a Berkshire hunt if I did that wouldn’t I?
I don’t give a monkeys chuff about legalities and precedents, it’s wrong, the end.
I know some German and Dutch teams have incentived match or concert ticket holders with reduced rail fairs if they travel outside the congested period (hour after the game).
Not seen anything outside the Box or creative to make things smoother.
I get that the hospitality is expensive, but the crux of it all is, that its all about how much money the club can raise, to allow Roma to buy the players they want. Simple.
I agree with all of that but I still think it's worthwhile having campaigns like Kick It Out and the rainbow stuff in football, taking the knee in the US etc. The perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good.
Is there anything to stop these match-by-match hospitality tickets ending up in away supporters hands? That's been an issue in other PL stadia in recent times.
What I'm getting at is that there is nowhere decent (seats, heating) in GA to entice people to stay back and I think that is an opportunity missed. What the club would probably say is that they don't want to encroach on their GA+ offering which I...
Potentially you may be right, if I were to receive any money from the friends and family who have my seat, but I don’t, so I’m not sub-letting, therefore the club are bellwhiffs for this membership swiz.
Heavy day out if you take a couple of kids with you.
I’ll keep my ST for Bramley Moore next season, then I’m getting rid and going to non-league footy with my lad. It’s just not worth it anymore.
People defending clubs for demanding seats be resold, minimum games attended etc can GTF imo. Next thing it'll be requiring attendance at all cup matches or lose your ST etc.
Acceptance of these moves just means increased likelihood of supporters...