Bang to rights, with a larger breach... a bit like Forest then 🤔
To be fair, given we already have 50% more points taken than Forest, combined with the double jeopardy argument, and assuming last years accounts show a positive trend, I'd expect...
Unless the scale of the breach is absolutely wild (ie worse than last time) and we're bang to rights I agree, and I can't see how it would be. Maybe we'd swallow one point just to avoid the uncertainty and expense but if the total of the two...
I am surprised they have appealed , it is hard to argue they didn't get an advantage having Brennan Johnson in the team. They got a huge fee for the player which would suggest he was their best player/most valuable asset then you would think...
Tories and Labour, both one and the same these days, both cheeks of the same arse.
No longer is there a party of the working class, both want to tax the working man to pay for their immigrant benefits and net zero policies.
Sorry, I digressed.
Even with the PL and these kangaroo Court IP's, I can't see how Forest can hope to get a reduction on an already reduced penalty. Surely the "cooperative" bonus points get added back on here. The IP's have been slated for their inconsistency, so...
Yea I'd expect they will write off as much loss as they can. Who knows if they can keep it below the £35M mark, but if they do then we should have a strong case for zero points deduction with us having the previous 2 years already stung for.
We did well with player sales in the last 12 months. £82.8M in sales with spending only £42.3M. And the Beto and Chermiti purchase costs only start next season and are amortised, so we've actually spent almost nothing.
100%, any points is an immediate appeal and probable suit against the league. The Forest commission ALREADY said they didnt understand why we had been overly punished with 6 points from the other commission. At this point we have been treated...