Recent content by DoctorVictim

So the Mic'd up bollocks with Webb and Owen is out now. I can't really believe the [Poor language removed] they let him get away with, at least interview him with someone who will challenge him. He casually starts to shift the goalposts of saying 'We must remember the referee on field gave it for a pull from...

Doucoure did the same first half , he ran through in the box and would have got, let's call it a 'Gakpo' penalty, if he went down as he ran across the defender and legs tangled. But he stayed up and cross got blocked.

I'm going to keep saying it until I'm blue in the face, pardon the pun, but if Forest don't get 2 additional points added following their appeal, Everton should take the process further. Or at least use it in our appeal so we remove the 2 points from the 2nd charge. The commissions have tried...

The main point for me from the review is the suggestion from the PL not to use Nottingham Forest decision as a Benchmark. It's an admission of flaws in that ruling. This IC tries to avoid using a mathematical approach to deductions but states it has to by following our first appeal. One point...

Haha, fair. However the verdict agrees and explicitly states their breach was 77% worse than ours. If you can spend 35m over and 19m over and you get the same points... well that's a farce isn't it? People have no disincentive to not splurge more/buy another player. And it's worse than 16m...

There's a very simple thing our football club need to do. Ask for the explicit points breakdown for our first charge like is on the final pages of Nottingham Forests. The calculation will not stack up and be clear to see discrepancy between the two processes. You don't even need to be a lawyer...