Of course we can, we should have come off the field in the lead at half time last season at Anfield then never had a shot on target in the second half, in fact we never did much attacking in the second period — the game lasts for ninety minutes...
I don’t think it’s particularly controversial to say it might have been worth rolling the dice a bit. Of course it could have gone wrong, anything could go wrong, but on balance I think it’s fair to say we could have been a bit more proactive...
Agreed we'd have won with them two but Richie scored 5 goals in his first season in the prem at the same age Barry is. People saying we need a new striker when we've seen about 3 minutes of the one we just bought is doing my head in ha
Fair enough I didn’t see any difference in the performance of the team and didn’t see anything special from Rohl but he’s new to the team and gets a walkover for that.
Perhaps you are right and Alcaraz (for instance) is not as good as those who were already on the pitch. However, he could have offered fresh legs against a tiring Aston Villa backline which may have swung the pendulum in our favour. That is...
I think it's fine to say you wouldn't have changed it but I just can't agree that you shouldn't make subs unless someone's having a nightmare. That's the whole point of having a squad and options. For me we became a bit predictable on saturday...
I’m not having a go at Moysie here, I really like the guy , but does anybody else think he leaves it to late to change things . Alcaraz, McNeil and Dibling not brought on . Villa were there for the taking and we dropped 2 points . Roll on Saturday eh