We’d have missed out on £20m of additional profit?
Regardless, I certainly hope he’s worth the £34m or whatever we’re paying for him, as there’s seems to be a fair few people think we’re doing well paying that amount for a 22 year old unproven...
If we had signed him a year ago, would he have developed in the way he has though? Highly unlikely he would have got enough game time to do so at that age.
Yes we need to find players before the big fees but by doing that we will have a lot more...
Just see it like the onana deal with barry having less of the experience. Is the sort of player you would like think going forward we can be that club who pay less and identify earlier.
Once again, where was our interest when he was moving for £14m last season……
Better yet, was he even heard of when we were spending £15m on Chermiti…..
All the other Chelsea threads seem to have locked, but looks like their strategy might have back fired with Mudryk.
I expect provided he maintains his innocence, cites an inadvertent ingestion (assuming it’s not a team wide programme) they will...
Not with something like that you're not. Your employer cannot legally tell you not to spend time with a friend who they don't like. If you think meeting someone who the public don't like but who has not been found guilty of a crime could be...