The first version of this article claimed we had £200 million to spend. The article in the link suggests £150 million, and the headline £100 million.
Lost £100 million in a matter of minutes.
contrast with a few minutes later:
“Because I think Liverpool are absolutely right to snub 60 million for him because he scored 17 goals in all competitions last season. That was his most prolific campaign for the club.
Versatile as well...
“This would be quite an interesting turn of events for Newcastle, because you buy a player for 60-odd million, and then the money that's been quoted potentially over 100 million, that will show a really decent return for Newcastle, wouldn't it...