I like to look at whoscored.com after watching the game. You have to take it with a grain of salt. Usually the numbers will track what I just watched. Sometimes they're off, which could be because the model is dumb, because the underlying numbers don't reflect the reality of what happened, or in a few cases because the numbers show something which may have escaped notice.
I was surprised by this:
View attachment 181214
The Everton numbers track with the eye test, except Gray is much lower that I would have thought and there's no way I would have called McNeil MOTM.
But the numbers are interesting. McNeil had 5 dribbles, second only to Gordon; a team high 10 attempted tackles; 3 interceptions, tied for team lead with Myko; 4 blocks (Patterson had 8, no one else more than 3). So he put in a Gana-like shift. He took care of the ball. Other than the ball to Iwobi that led to Iwobi feeding Gordon for his goal, he didn't do much offensively, but without doing much that would make the highlights he was excellent in defensive actions from the forward slot. That was touted as one of his strengths when we got him.
I was impressed that we took it right to Leeds from the start with the aggressive press and beat them at their own game in the first half. Our forwards were the big contributors and it looks like McNeil especially. I think it bodes well for when we have actual striker(s) for him to target.