It's an absolutely abhorrent suggestion to continue with insane rule changes that can only be of a huge, ginormous benefit to ONE team in the entire league, and potentially an advantage to a number of teams challenging for 4th and 5th. Why would clubs agree to continue with the threat or relegation removed and endanger their players, when they will be fully in their rights to refuse to return until a vaccine is developed?Once you factor in we might not not even be playing for relegation , it’ll be absolutely dire and I say this As someone whose become borderline obsessed with Belarusian footy .
O that's interesting.
Liverpool and Chelsea want Women’s Super League season abandoned over player safety concerns
Molly Hudson
Monday May 04 2020, 12.00pm BST, The Times
![]()
Liverpool would be relegated if the season were cancelled and decided by points per game
Liverpool and Chelsea are among a number of Women’s Super League teams who do not want the season to resume over fears that it would endanger player safety. Their club representatives will relay this information to the Football Association this week.
Chelsea sit second in the table, a point behind Manchester City but with a game in hand. Liverpool are bottom of the league, with six points from 14 games. If the season were decided on points per game, and with the one usual relegation spot, Chelsea would win the title, while Liverpool would be relegated to the part-time Championship.
lol
Agreed. We should just null and void and pretend that the season never happened. A bit like Heysel.You ok there Ollie Holt?
PPG isn't a fair solution - it another rigged deck, as bad a suggestion as fezzy of football, neutral venues, no fans in the ground etc.
No tackles no contact???? Oh my word hahaha. So basically a free attack to score. Then the opposition does the same from the kick off
This is the biggest joke of all the suggestions