If I am entirely honest while your as a whole stadium looks absolutely wonderful and will be fitting home, those exterior lights seem a bit half-hearted.Funny you should say that...they've been testing (some) of the lights at ours tonight...
(excuse the o/t, couldn't resist)
Funny you should say that...they've been testing (some) of the lights at ours tonight...
(excuse the o/t, couldn't resist)
looks amazingFunny you should say that...they've been testing (some) of the lights at ours tonight...
(excuse the o/t, couldn't resist)
Why does that even bother people..Why should he worry about the design of a stadium he may not even visit??
).
Blind the Birkenhead toads!Yep, and this is where BMD is at an advantage. The brightness of the lights is limited at NWHL because it's a built up area (I've seen the docs relating to this, how we're having to be careful to stop light overspill into other building etc). So it was never going to look like e.g. the Allianz Arena at night. It was always going to be more half-hearted (I prefer 'subtle'
The sides of your stadium that are on the waterfront will be able to be lit up much brighter. Meis and the club need to take full advantage of that.
Gives them a target to aim at in their homemade canoes for night games.
I creamed when we were in for the Kings Dock due to it being right opposite the top of Whetstone Lane in Tranmere and the view you would get of the stadium from up there.
Perhaps a good example to compare against, the new proposed stadium in Rotterdam...waterside stadium, 63,000 seats, in my opinion better in every way to the designs that we've seen.
Perhaps a good example to compare against, the new proposed stadium in Rotterdam...waterside stadium, 63,000 seats, in my opinion better in every way to the designs that we've seen.
