Because there is absolutely a time when sacking someone comes way too late.How so?
Because there is absolutely a time when sacking someone comes way too late.How so?
Let’s all quit with this ridiculous talk; Silva should go nowhere. I blame him for two things:
1. Zonal marking; although that may be more a Pickford deficiency issue.
2. Richarlison refuses to pass the ball ever; and he is generally a player of dismal character. I wish we would not have purchased him.
Other than that he’s doing a pretty good job. String some wins together and finish 7th and it’s pretty much what I expected from this season.
2 wins in our last 10 league games, included in them last 10 games we played Southampton, Brighton, Newcastle (home) Watford (home) Leicester (home) and only picked up 2 points from those games. Knocked out the FA cup by Millwall, a team sitting 19th in the championship. Yep, doing a pretty good job.
Because there is absolutely a time when sacking someone comes way too late.
Yeah, but Moyes inherited an ancient team with not much quality. Marco has a squad with plenty of quality, he just can’t use it.
We used talk about Dacourt, now we end up in it.
He needs to be given two seasons minimum. The change in thinking, personnel and mental attitude just can’t be done in 6-8 months....it’s too big an ask. We’ve won nothing for 25 years, so how do we expect a manager to change it in less than one?
This manager is here on the back of two painfully negative coaches in Koeman and Allardyce. Prior to that we thought and hoped the School of Science was back for Summer term under Martinez....and with more focus on the defensive demands of the game we may well have marched towards the light at he end of the quarter-century tunnel. Before that we’d all grown stale with Moyes and his tedious ‘play for a draw’ mentality that more often than not had us getting beat and unable to come from behind.
It’s ingrained in this Club. It’s ingrained in us the supporters, in the players, in the coaching staff, the Directors and probably the Tea Lady and whoever cleans the toilets. It’s amplified as them over the park are on fire (if only that were literal),and the fact that Origi’s bizarre 96th minute goal in the Derby is what’s brought this bout of ‘Everton that’ upon us just makes it ten times worse.
Changing manager won’t solve most of those issues. I’d stick with the fella...I think he has the balls to start dealing with players who aren’t half-assed about the Club, or who can’t learn simple football concepts. I think he’s been reluctant to savage them on the basis he hoped the honeymoon libido would last just long enough for them to grasp his methods. Alas, they haven’t and I expect he and Brands will come out all guns fighting in the next few weeks.
As an aside, I keep reading it’s the fault of zonal marking. Well, I’m not a fan of it, but I do know zonal marking doesn’t stop you being able to head a ball.
How refreshing it would be to put Huddersfield to the sword tomorrow, follow up with an entertaining win against Wolves at the weekend and then go toe-to-toe in confidence against the hopefully soon-to-be-crowned Champions.
We need some positivity.
I don't get the point you're trying to make? The two situations aren't related.
The reasons to sell Gana is because the season is over and this will be the best fee we can get for him. His head is turned, so may as well milk what we can for him.
I don't see the contradiction with that view and wanting Silva gone, because there's pretty much nothing Silva can do now to rescue himself. He could win the next 15 games convincingly but it's after the fact and largely doesn't matter as he couldn't get the job done when it mattered. It's like a club being relegated then winning every game after they're already down - who gives a toss? Granted, 15 wins means he'd keep his job, that's the reality, but I'd be amazed if we didn't immediately go back to being crap when the games mattered again.
The only way you can advocate Silva staying at this point in my view is if you place the blame on the players. But for me, the players aren't choosing to zonal mark, regardless of the evidence it doesn't work. That's management.
With coaching there is ample potential. We lack a striker (surprise, surprise) but we have better players than the likes of Watford, Bournemouth, etc.Out of this enormous squad can you name 6 players who have 'plenty of quality' ?
I cant.
lol
Thats spot on
This post is all thats wrong with the attitude of the fanbase at this time.
Zonal marking (which all the top teams in european football use) doesnt work because of the management???That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
The reason its not working is because of the players -- thats just obvious. Cant you see them every single game failing to concentrate? Why is that? Because THEY ARENT GOOD ENOUGH.
Keane cant head a ball and Zouma loses concentration whilst Mina is trying to adapt while stuck next to these 2.
Thats not the fault of the management. 90% of these donkeys werent signed by Silva/Brands...they also cant be sold as no one wants them because THEY ARENT GOOD ENOUGH.
If Marco Silva (with a handful of his own players) can win 15 games in a row then he deserves a knighthood.
What is so hard to understand about this?
Christ if we appointed Pep you would probably expect the title within 7 months when at city hes changed almost the entire team lol klopp has changed the entire team...and mourinho failed as he wasnt allowed to.
I thought you were better than this Tubey. Its not hard to see the mess were in thanks to koeman.
With coaching there is ample potential. We lack a striker (surprise, surprise) but we have better players than the likes of Watford, Bournemouth, etc.
It is the fault of the management. As a coach setting a game plan you have two options. You can insist on using a system without a regard for how the players perform under it, or you can adapt your game plan to accentuate your teams strengths and negate your teams weaknesses.Zonal marking (which all the top teams in european football use) doesnt work because of the management???That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
The reason its not working is because of the players -- thats just obvious. Cant you see them every single game failing to concentrate? Why is that? Because THEY ARENT GOOD ENOUGH.
Keane cant head a ball and Zouma loses concentration whilst Mina is trying to adapt while stuck next to these 2.
Thats not the fault of the management. 90% of these donkeys werent signed by Silva/Brands...they also cant be sold as no one wants them because THEY ARENT GOOD ENOUGH.
It is the fault of the management. As a coach setting a game plan you have two options. You can insist on using a system without a regard for how the players perform under it, or you can adapt your game plan to accentuate your teams strengths and negate your teams weaknesses.
Silva is insisting on playing a Zonal system that since preseason has been, for whatever reason, completely unable to be used effectively in a game. By the sounds of it, it works perfectly in training, but I do wonder how robustly it’s being tested. Regardless, our set piece defence is woeful.
As a coach, it’s up to Silva to fix the system. To say the players aren’t good enough is an absolute cop out. It’s up to him to create something which works for the players we have, even if it isn’t his preferred method.
Just because Zonal is used other places doesn’t mean it’s the right thing for us. It’s the managers fault
Even if the original premise wasn’t contradictory, this post is.I don't get the point you're trying to make? The two situations aren't related.
The reasons to sell Gana is because the season is over and this will be the best fee we can get for him. His head is turned, so may as well milk what we can for him.
I don't see the contradiction with that view and wanting Silva gone, because there's pretty much nothing Silva can do now to rescue himself. He could win the next 15 games convincingly but it's after the fact and largely doesn't matter as he couldn't get the job done when it mattered. It's like a club being relegated then winning every game after they're already down - who gives a toss? Granted, 15 wins means he'd keep his job, that's the reality, but I'd be amazed if we didn't immediately go back to being crap when the games mattered again.
The only way you can advocate Silva staying at this point in my view is if you place the blame on the players. But for me, the players aren't choosing to zonal mark, regardless of the evidence it doesn't work. That's management.
Even if the original premise wasn’t contradictory, this post is.
You’re effectively saying we should sack him because of zonal marking but we should still sack him even if we win our next 15 games - which would surely just prove that zonal marking is absolutely not a problem at all.
Winning our next 15 games really, really wouldn’t be anything even remotely like winning your remaining games after going down would it? If we stop with the woe is me melodrama then all that’s actually happened is we’ve been knocked out of a cup that we’ve only won 5 times in 140 years. If we won all our remaining games we’d quite possibly finish in the champions league spots , would definitely finish in our highest position for years and would have smashed our longest winning streak. But you’d want the manager sacked because we conceded a last minute goal away at Milwall.
I would be very careful about making libelous comments like that if I were you.
As a retired Solicitor I can tell you that Baines and Jagielka are likely to have a very strong cause of action against you.
I think that the moderators should also be aware that you place the Forum in potential peril.