I wouldn't call it utter nonsense. Lukaku scored a lot of his goals against teams we would probably have beaten anyway (Sunderland, Bournemouth). I might be wrong, but I can only remember him scoring against Man City (4-0), from the teams above us. He wasn't the difference in the big games. He wasn't even the difference in tough games. He never took defenders out of the game, for others to score. For Lukaku, it was all about Lukaku. He didn't contribute much else, unless he was on the end of the move. I can't argue with his goal scoring ability, but it is a perfectly reasonable argument that we would have still finished 7th. We were a top 7 side before Lukaku got here. There is also the fact that the teams below us, weren't that strong. So finishing 7th wasn't really that hard.