Ronald Koeman discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
nsno-chris said:
lollollol

Go find me a post when I was slating that utter fraud in his first season. Put the knives away Dave it's embarrassing, embraces Ronald.

But ok, he's giving us total futbol now
Click to expand...
You did it before he started and carried it on from there.

Your nose must be Pinocchio length mate.
 

davek said:
You dont know that. How can you say what Henry does at Belgian is any greater input than what he received here with Martinez and his coaches or Martinez and other coaches at Belgium. It's just pure speculation.
Click to expand...
You have no idea if his tutelage under Martinez was anything remarkable or continues to be...yet your are calling someone else out for speculation.
 

JEBUS_LIVES said:
You have no idea if his tutelage under Martinez was anything remarkable or continues to be...yet your are calling someone else out for speculation.
Click to expand...
I know he brought him here and we got record numbers of goals out of him.

That in and of itself was the biggest transfer success in the last 30 years at this club.

He'll leave having scored 70 goals and for a 250% profit on the £27M wisely invested in him.

Hats off to that.

Somehow I doubt we'll have that return off another player we paid £27M for.
 
DualityNSNO said:
FWIW, Lukaku was quite well known and touted as one for the future well before he played for us, or WBA, or before Chelsea for that matter.
Click to expand...
he was a massive talent that was well known to anyone that payed anything like the smallest amount of interest in European football...its the reason that Chelsea signed him and a host of other massive clubs around the world were interest in him, including Moyes at Everton. The argument that only Martinez was able to spot and devlop this diamond in the rough is just insane.
 
davek said:
It is what it is. If a player he inherited wasn't here we'd be sunk, because he's shown no aptitude whilst here to attack without recourse to an over-reliance on Lukaku.

Season two (if he's not at Barcelona of course!) will be very interesting with a Lukaku-less Everton.
Click to expand...
Brown shoes had the same resource at his disposal for 3 years, and yet last season could only manage a disgusting 4 home wins.

Koeman has delivered 10 already and turned Goodison back into a fortress, as opposed to a nice day out for whoever rocked up and rolled us over.

That's down to more than one player, it's down to good management and tactical nous.

Had Lukaku not had a great season you'd have been calling Koeman for not getting the best out of him, because he's the leading PL goalscorer we're now a one man team. It's nothing more than your boring agenda Dave.
 

davek said:
I know he brought him here and we got record numbers of goals out of him.

That in and of itself was the biggest transfer success in the last 30 years at this club.

He'll leave having scored 70 goals and for a 250% profit on the £27M wisely invested in him.

Hats off to that.

Somehow I doubt we'll have that return off another player we paid £27M for.
Click to expand...

So a self proclaimed Evertonian does not know how much Lukaku cost? It was £28m officially in 2014, a record fee.
 
hktoffee said:
So an alleged Evertonian does not know how much Lukaku cost? It was £28m officially in 2014, a record fee.
Click to expand...

The Bayeux Tapestry wouldn't be long enough to list the amount of errors you've managed you utter bozo

You even admit a mistake in the Snivelley thread this morning
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Register

Shop

Back
Top