Donald Trump for President Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tbh the Brexit polls issue is a bit of a myth, in June there were 17 polls showing leave winning. 14 showed remain. 3 ties. People just didn't believe the polls and thought the undecideds would break for Remain.


I think Brexit ended up winning by 4 and the day before where 4 points down which makes it an 8 point swing. That's huge and well outside the margin of error.

I think there probably is more closet Trump supporters. I suspect a lot of Gary Johnson supporters are on the fence and if Trump stopped putting his foot in it he would have probably got the majority of them. I also think Trump's supporters are more committed so their turnout will be higher.

It's not over till it's over and last night he destroyed Clinton until he again put his foot in it by saying he wouldn't necessarily trust the result and the hombre remark.

I thought he was awful in the first and slightly better in the 2nd however the moderator was from Fox news this time so at least for a change was unbiased. The first two moderators where disgraceful and given them and the media and uni-party tactics I'm not surprised he thinks they would go that far. Frankly so do I but you don't say it and just walk into a volley of criticism.
 
Hit up #TrumpBookReport on the twitters
I wouldn't trust anything from Twitter. They have been banning conservative journalists.

Just a couple of days ago the guy who did the expose on the Clintons hiring thugs to create violence at Trump rallies was banned.

Them, Facebook, Google and other tech firms have been coordinating with the media to skew their "algorithm" search results.

I have no problem with people who view stuff on CNN etc but just remember almost the entire media is bought and paid for by special interests. If you want to get a fair understanding of what's going on then you also have to go to somewhere like Breitbart. Now of course that's neither fair or balanced either but if you get your news from both sides then it's equal. Otherwise the people who don't are just sheep.
 
I wouldn't trust anything from Twitter. They have been banning conservative journalists.

Just a couple of days ago the guy who did the expose on the Clintons hiring thugs to create violence at Trump rallies was banned.

Them, Facebook, Google and other tech firms have been coordinating with the media to skew their "algorithm" search results.

I have no problem with people who view stuff on CNN etc but just remember almost the entire media is bought and paid for by special interests. If you want to get a fair understanding of what's going on then you also have to go to somewhere like Breitbart. Now of course that's neither fair or balanced either but if you get your news from both sides then it's equal. Otherwise the people who don't are just sheep.

Ummm... do you understand words and such?
 

I wouldn't trust anything from Twitter. They have been banning conservative journalists.

Just a couple of days ago the guy who did the expose on the Clintons hiring thugs to create violence at Trump rallies was banned.

Them, Facebook, Google and other tech firms have been coordinating with the media to skew their "algorithm" search results.

I have no problem with people who view stuff on CNN etc but just remember almost the entire media is bought and paid for by special interests. If you want to get a fair understanding of what's going on then you also have to go to somewhere like Breitbart. Now of course that's neither fair or balanced either but if you get your news from both sides then it's equal. Otherwise the people who don't are just sheep.
What?
 
I don't think he understands comedy and sarcasm.

What's funnier he says Breitbart is balanced news.
Do you understand words and such?

I said.

"If you want to get a fair understanding of what's going on then you also have to go to somewhere like Breitbart. Now of course that's neither fair or balanced either but if you get your news from both sides then it's equal."

If you go to Breitbart you can see the evidence of all the media colluding including what was released by Wikileaks. Whereas CNN said it was against the law for Americans to read Wikileaks... which it's not.
 

The first western news source by a long way to report on the cologne new year festivities. But anyway, how many people jumping on trump for his remarks about accepting the election result are complaining about the EU referendum?

I must have missed the claims from the head of the remain party that it was all rigged.
 
Do you understand words and such?

I said.

"If you want to get a fair understanding of what's going on then you also have to go to somewhere like Breitbart. Now of course that's neither fair or balanced either but if you get your news from both sides then it's equal."

If you go to Breitbart you can see the evidence of all the media colluding including what was released by Wikileaks. Whereas CNN said it was against the law for Americans to read Wikileaks... which it's not.
Breitbart is conservative. It's partisan.

The only way to actually cut through media bias is to go to the underlying sources and data - not simply read a variety of different biases.
 
The first western news source by a long way to report on the cologne new year festivities. But anyway, how many people jumping on trump for his remarks about accepting the election result are complaining about the EU referendum?
And wanting to change the result by any means they can. It has been the first website to report on plenty of the big stories in the last couple of years normally at the same time the vast majority of the media are trying to suppress it like what happened at Cologne.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top