I'm not getting into an argument about semantics.
I expect the owner to invest in the club not gift the club anything. If he invests 300m in the club then he would expect shares in return, those extra shares would have to be released by the club thereby diluting everyone else down. Since the club is probably only worth 200m doing this would probably leave him with around 75%. That's the figure that reportedly he will jump up to so that's probably what will happen but as yet nothing has happened and now we're hearing rumors that's not what is going to happen. Who knows. We need to wait and see but currently he hasn't invested a penny and given the structure of the deal I'm not even to sure he can.
As for where my info came from. It came from esk who is a huge supporter and champion of Moshiri. Not someone with an axe to grind.
Is that now clear because this is boring me as well as I'm sure everyone else reading it.
Take the point this should be on another thread. Mosh ain't going to invest 300mil though. His 49% only cost him £85m.
On the other point, I haven't read Esk stating Moshiri hasn't put a penny in to the club. What matters though is that the funds available to the club are used wisely, and I believe moshiri will influence that.
If we see, say £50- £60m spent (net) this week on players, but you have no 'evidence' that a penny of it comes from Moshiri, I'd just be interested to know how you'd view that?